The Atheist Citizen: The Threat of Atheism to Society

The Atheist Citizen: The Threat of Atheism to Society “If you don’t believe in a God to answer to, then what’s the point of trying to modify your actions to stay within acceptable limits?! That’s what I thought anyway, I’ve always believed that evolution is a fact, that we came from the mud: when we die, there’s nothing!” - The atheist serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer. "If a person doesn’t think there is a God to be accountable to, then—then what’s the point of trying to modify your behavior to keep it within acceptable ranges? That’s how I thought anyway. I always believed the theory of evolution as truth, that we all just came from the slime. When we, when we died, you know, that was it, there is nothing…" - Jeffrey Dahmer, Interview with Stone Phillips, Dateline NBC, Nov.29, 1994. Black Ducks There is no doubt that the demand for a sense of excellence is one of the entrances to passion and arrogance when it arises from a real lack of self and not from the merit praised by others, such as the Arabi, who was saddened by his lack of fame among people, and when Mecca - and in a way contrary to you know - pissed in the well of Zamzam and bear beating and blame for it only to be famous! Hence, it is right for us to view atheists’ view of themselves as “black ducks” among other light-colored ducks! Because, at the same time, people do see them as an odd element among themselves, so what is the reason? Why do other societies in the world agree to exclude “black ducks” from them or to view them as inferior and disrespectful? The secret of excellence; a curse on atheists I looked at their situation to know the secret of the persecution of people and societies? They are from all levels of life from the young tramp to the prostitute to the university doctor to the educated employee and even the world of physics or biology. As well as what may be issued by them of crimes or encroachments I will not lie and deny the possibility of issuing the likes of the people of religions or secular!! So: What is the reason for the difference (villain) that makes them in the category of the famous B. "Do you believe in atheists?: Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice" The article was based on the results of a study by Professor Will Gervais and colleagues and was published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology about why atheists are not trusted to be treated. As well as the title of the article of the site Scientific American entitled sarcasm: We do not believe in atheists (3): "In Atheists we distrust" Or the Washington Post article that asks: Why do Americans still not like atheists? "Why do Americans still dislike atheists". This is based on inductive studies that confirmed that the hatred of atheists in America alone reached 39.6%, which was expressed by the famous newspaper News Junkie Post in its explicit title (Research Finds that Atheists are Most Hated and Destroyed Minority) about the most hated and distrustful groups. I say: I looked at what distinguishes atheists in order to be accompanied by this constant contempt for them in societies of different orientations (Islamic - Christian - religious - secular) and found that (the lack of axioms and moral reference or values for them). All believers, regardless of their sects, are satisfied with the mental constants and are convinced of them, such as the axiom of the existence of a creator and creator of all this delicate universe and creatures, and that nothingness does not create anything, and the impossibility of the emergence of consciousness and the will of a deaf substance without a god, which is unfortunately not characterized by atheists in order to avenge their atheism and evade them from acknowledging God. All believers also have moral or value references to which they can be judged if they make a mistake or turn away from it – even secularism also has its own rules that it legislates such as respect for laws and not to infringe on personal rights and freedoms and so on – except atheism! It is evident in our anomaly in this nihilistic view of any reference he possesses, whether in ethics, values, laws or freedoms. There is no doubt that this stems from the absence of the existential concept (positive) of the atheist, otherwise you can imagine an atheist who does not see in himself or others only a group of atoms without a soul gathered by chance without a goal, and then it also disperses after a long or short life with no value and no existential purpose in life!! An atheist with this reference is not expected to be God himself, and the concept of right and wrong is relative to his needs and desires. We will not dwell on this nihilistic background of atheism and atheism but turn to its practical manifestations which make the "atheist citizen" an already anomalous black duck whom no one desires! And believe me, you will be impressed by what you will read shortly after atheists analyze for themselves murder, extermination, rape, marital infidelity according to their need and indefinable lust! Affiliation and Sacrifice The feeling of belonging and sacrifice in man cannot be nourished materially or with all the money and treasures of the world, only religious and family psychological beliefs and motives are the only tributary to him, which is what all the world leaders of politicians, rulers and kings know, so you see in the believing armies that this emotional state of belonging and sacrifice is invoked and ignited before any battle or decisive move in which the soldier may be wounded or killed! Now we return to the atheistic scale and ask: In any atheistic reference or value we find that some of the material atoms of others have priority in survival at the expense of the atoms of the body of the atheist?! Or even deserve to be infected for it and we will not say death!! Strangely, we see that the relationships of children and parents are also destroyed on the threshold of survival mechanisms for the strongest and at the feet of the founders of the atheistic ideas material and evolutionary(6) that feeds on the atheistic ideas and inspirations of the atheists of evolution, and even Darwin himself in his book! So, with a purely psychological social balance, an atheist is far from feeling a sense of belonging or sacrifice – which goes beyond refraining from sacrificing injury or death to refraining from sacrificing money and everything if his atheism is true – is this type of “citizens” desired by anyone?! The Secretariat and the Judicial Certificate There have been two famous incidents of the American people in which the common event was the power cuts to more than one state at a time, so that they call the one incident “Black Day”, and you find it in their English documentaries and in another translated into Arabic as “America in the Dark”. In such facts, the world saw the practical value of the religious and humanitarian meaning of the word “conscience”, and how that conscience that swims against matter and the selfishness of atheism has the greatest effect in controlling community safety in the event of weakness or lack of (official) or (government) control in the country! In the normal case, we see the commitment of the secretariat in all shops, supermarkets or large malls, and we see security – presumably – and it hangs on many streets and houses and houses because there is security and police in the vicinity watching and watching, but: What when the electricity or power is cut off, surveillance cameras and photography stop and darkness prevails in the streets, houses and houses? We say, “If the Lord is not the Lord of the worlds, how can He be the Lord of the universe?” Although theft and trespass can be issued from a misguided believer who is mistaken or guilty as we said, but the believer or the laity can judge him to his moral or value reference and base the argument on him, where thinking about this for him is a deterrent (mental) and (heart) preliminary before proceeding to any infringement or crime, but the atheist: Where does he have such a deterrent except fear of punishment, which fell with the fall of censorship and cameras and the dark darkness? This is a simple and quick example of the concept of (honesty) in terms of its presence in the believer and the atheist, and is measured by the example of many very examples that do not end of our daily lives unfortunately and can never be trusted by the honesty of the atheist because of the lack of this moral or value reference, which allows him to do and justify anything at any time according to his interest and according to his desire!! From finding a paper money in the street without being seen, and ending with betrayal of the symptoms and wives of relatives, neighbors and friends! If this is the case, what is the percentage of the validity of the testimony of the atheist in the courts?! We grew up from a young age and we see in our Islamic and Arab countries, and even foreign as in movies and series, the judge always made sure that the witness takes the oath or oath or alliance to embarrass him in front of his conscience – that immaterial conscience that does not recognize his atheist existence in the first place – and here we can imagine that funny situation when the atheist stands in the room and the judge asks him to take the oath, what he will swear and what he owes! Is a comical image in fact produced by the lack of moral sense and honesty of the material atheist to be replaced by the meanings of personal interest or opportunism or the interest of who pays the most? The same as what was said in our talk about honesty of the possibility of such betrayals of believers – and we do not deny that, although it removes the description of faith at that moment – but as we have already explained, there is a fundamental difference in the existence of a mental deterrent heart before the crime? This is why the believer hesitates before it or repents after it, but in the case of the atheist, he does not. Allah says: “Allah commands you to give the trusts to their people.” This applies to the return of deposits and dealing honestly with the Muslim and the infidel alike, so that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) despite all that he suffered from his people, except that he took care of his secretariat with them, where they deposited their things with him despite their hostility to him, and how can they not know him all his life with honesty? As for the testimony of the truth, it says: "O you who have believed, be firm martyrs of God, even against yourselves or your parents and relatives." Women 135. The verse does not need to be explained, and was counted by the Harvard University Law School as one of the greatest statements of justice in human history!! They chose it to be among the inscriptions on the main wall facing the entrance. So they applied that vision more broadly in the important and sensitive work of any state or civil society, and even in matters of marriage, education, and care. For example, in the above article (we do not believe in atheists), most Americans do not accept their children as teachers of atheists. Why are they so honest with themselves in excluding the Atheist Citizen? The famous Russian writer Fyodor Dostoevsky (died 1881) says in his last and most wonderful novel, which dives into the human psyche with its precise scalpel - the story of the Karamazov brothers -: "If there is no God, everything is permissible"! John Locke, one of the founders of the modern civil state (died 1704), once said: "Those who deny the existence of God cannot be tolerated at all. ... Promise, covenant and oath are the bonds of human society: they have no value to the atheist!! Thus does not end the series of wise judgment on (black duck) homosexuality and psychological and societal corruption and to this day, we have chosen the article of only two of the ancients to see the accuracy of their view of the atheist who arrived today far worse than in their time!! How true were their expectations? Ruining science. An atheist is the only person who sees a machine and finds out how it works: he has to deny his watch to have a maker! Because this is a summary of his alleged atheism When he looks at any phenomenon in the universe or creatures he claims to have no creator or maker as long as he can know how it works or does its job! Also, he is the only one who if he sits in front of a computer program and does not know the function of one of a button: he has to deny his watch to have a designer or program. The evil of science then; this science that despises reason and logic! The anomalies and corruption do not end there, but we see more frauds (atheist citizen) of the facts when he claims that science believes in the existence of only all tangible and visible!! This is for the age of God disease has no medicine for the wise!! As it is known that scientists have proved the existence of gravity Earth, for example, electrons, photons and other just their effects, although he did not see them or understand them! What is strange here, by contrast, is that the atheist is desperate to prove his atheistic superstitions and hypothetical fantasies – the idea of evolution as an example – without a single tangible physical evidence according to his way of thinking! This is either by rushing to his own God to explain all the functions of the members as evidence of evolution. And as it does in the name of atrophied organs or scrap genes – or more illusory stories about evolution in the ancient past that no one has seen or will see, or more fraud and falsification of evidence of evolution, it soon becomes exposed – such as their falsification and the authorship of many fossils of intermediate organisms that did not really exist. Here's just one small example of what an atheist citizen in science is. In the 1990s, a piece of dolphin rib was found, but evolutionists immediately said that it was a vestige of a human ancestor’s clavicle – can you imagine a single piece of bone simply fabricating scientific lies and underestimating the minds of the simple and the unspecialized! – and of course it was soon discovered by Dr. Tim White, a professor of evolutionary anthropology at the University of California, Berkeley. Underestimating life and people As we have said before, atheists view us as a collection of atoms no more, no less! – a purely physical view devoid of any value, emotion, purpose or purpose. The most famous atheist physicist and astronomer Stephen Hawking says: “The human race is nothing but chemical scum on the surface of a medium-sized planet.”13 If this is the view of a scholar of the Atheists! how are the Atheists and their cohorts?! This is another evolutionary atheist, Sir David Attenborough: “Stop feeding Third World nations to reduce the world’s population.” The woe of a world in which atheists took the reins of politics and military rule has annihilated millions of their own and other peoples for the most trivial reasons and to impose atheism and communism on them – such as Stalin, Lenin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot and others – and their scholars and intellectuals should only expect from them (as atheist citizens) purely nihilistic statements that carry only the slow death of the poor and the weak for their own comfort! Ease of crime as long as no reckoning after death. For example, the serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer, who killed almost 15 young men and cut their bodies and sometimes skinned and ate parts of them or kept their skeletons, said in an interview with NBC and broadcaster Stone Phillips in 1994 after his arrest: “If someone doesn’t believe in a God to account for him, then what’s the point of trying to modify your actions to stay within acceptable limits?! "If a person doesn’t think there is a God to be accountable to, then—then what’s the point of trying to modify your behaviour to keep it within acceptable ranges? That’s how I thought anyway. I always believed the theory of evolution as truth, that we all just came from the slime. When we, when we died, you know, that was it, there is nothing…". Of course, not all atheists are caught in the act of committing crimes like this serial killer, and there are others who establish such misdeeds in their books and words, and unfortunately few people pay attention to them, including the famous atheist Sam Harris, who sets the stage for any human crime by applying the same mechanisms of alleged development – such as survival of the strongest or fittest or passing genes, etc. – where he says of the crime of rape: “There is nothing more natural than rape.” "..there's nothing more natural than rape. Human beings rape, chimpanzees rape, orangutans rape, rape clearly is part of an evolutionary strategy to get your genes into the next generation". Corrupting the Gender Relationship Here we do not mean only homosexuality or homosexuality as they are called, but we will go further to make sure that the atheist has no law, no moral authority, and no fixed value except what he desires and wants as an animal: then he justifies it!! So it was very difficult for a man or a woman to be satisfied that his partner is an atheist and as we will see some reasons now. Richard Dawkins’s article “Banishing the Green-Eyed Monster” (17) emphasizes to his readers how “marital infidelity” has absolutely nothing in it from the perspective of animal materialism, and asks, “Why are all these concerns about fidelity to one wife? Returning to the original topic of sex outside marriage, I want to raise another question that interests me. Why are we so obsessed with monogamous fidelity in the first place? Agony Aunt columns ring with the cries of those who have detected -or fear- that their man/woman (who may or may not be married to them) is "cheating on them". "Cheating" really is the word that occurs most readily to these people. The underlying presumption -- that a human being has some kind of property rights over another human being's body -- is unspoken because it is assumed to be obvious. But with what justification Then it stopped, and even went beyond having sex with animals, and graced and honored the godless citizen whose words and actions are limitless. Peter Singer, professor of evolution at Preston University, says in a public video that since we are primate animals or apes, there should be no punishment for bestiality. We are animals, indeed more specifically, we are great apes. In his book Animal Liberation, he says that there is no prohibition of “beast” unless there is violence in it. Humans and animals can have "mutually satisfying" sexual relationships. Bestiality should remain illegal if it involves cruelty, but otherwise is no cause for shock or horror. Do you think that the people of the land will be able to make such a decision, or will they be able to make such a decision? Conclusion: An unfit citizen for coexistence Had we wished, we would have gone on to enumerate the disadvantages of the "atheist citizen", but what we have mentioned speaks to more in each of its points, and we conclude only with these (personal) qualities of the atheists which have been compiled from foreign studies to see firsthand what it would be like to coexist with the "black ducks" in society? The University of Tennessee in America has done a condensed research of more than one study on non-believers (agnostic – agnostic – ladins).20 It has come to the conclusion that non-believers are closed-minded, and narcissistic in an interesting way. We say: These are the qualities that are suitable for atheists already because they defend issues fallen mentally, logically and scientifically!! This is confirmed by the study also showed that 85% of non-believers are characterized by qualities: (anger - dialectic - dogmatism). Our comment on this that if they were right: There was no need to dogmatism and sophistry known to defend the false is not true. In another psychological test in the same research, atheists scored highest on traits (narcissism, dogmatism, anger, lowest rates of acceptance, and positive relationships with others). This is another American research from the University of Cambridge in which he criticizes atheism and shows the absurdity of his ideas and the lack of his goal, purpose and value in life, and even lists historical facts on it - and the research is full of many details and very important that we hope to translate in a separate article soon, God willing. Strangely enough, these same findings are the same as the famous 2004 study published by the American Psychiatric Association on its official website on the relationship between religious affiliation and suicide attempts.[22] The study showed that faith and family stability greatly reduce the increasing suicide rate among atheists, as they reduce their "aggressiveness" over believers as well as the tendency to "anger" and "rush" commensurate with their psychological and social disorders. So the conclusion: The atheist citizen is only as a black duck who is outcast from any decent society that keeps his family, and his family that keeps him. References: 1 Cinema and the Unconscious: The Popular Discourse of Atheism, 2nd issue of Brahin Magazine. (2) Gervais WM, et al, "Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice", J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Dec;101(6):1189-206. doi: 10.1037/a0025882. Epub 2011 Nov 7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22059841 (3) Daisy Grewal, "In Atheists We Distrust ", Scientific American, January 17, 2012. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/in-atheists-we-distrust/ (4) Gregory Paul and Phil Zuckerman, "Why do Americans still dislike atheists?", The Washington Post, April 29, 2011. http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-do-americans-still-dislike-atheists/2011/02/18/AFqgnwGF_story_1.html (5) Ole Ole Olson, " Research Finds that Atheists are Most Hated and Distrusted Minority", NEWS JUNKIE POST, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:31 am. http://newsjunkiepost.com/2009/09/19/research-finds-that-atheists-are-most-hated-and-distrusted-minority/ (6) Charles Darwin, "The Origin of Species", 6th edition 1872, by increasing Title VII - Version of the Egyptian National Translation Project 2004 - p 283. (7) The last two incidents can be seen in a National Geographic Abu Dhabi documentary, and can be seen in a YouTube video on DocumentaryHD3 at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QZxFbGd4aI (8) The Saudi student to the United States of America, Abdullah Friday, is the first to notice this verse engraved with others on the wall of the Faculty of Law, so he took this picture we quoted him from Twitter - and here is the link to the texts engraved on this wall: http://library.law.harvard.edu/justicequotes/explore-the-room/west/ 9 The Brothers Karamazov Book Eleven: Brother Ivan Fyodorovich is Fyodor's last work before his death. 10 John Locke, "A Message in Tolerance," Egyptian National Translation Project Edition 1997, p. 11 Science Between Faith and Atheism, No. 3 of the Journal of Proofs. (12) Dr. Tim White- Evolutionary anthropologist -University of California at Berkeley - New Scientist, April 28, 1983, p199. (13) Stephen Hawking, Reality on the Rocks: Beyond Our Ken, 1995. (14) Anthony Gucciardi, " David Attenborough: Stop Feeding Third World Nations to Reduce Population", Infowars.com, September 18, 2013. (15) Jeffrey Dahmer, in an interview with Stone Phillips, Dateline NBC, Nov.29, 1994. Full video interview link on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPMBfX7D4WU#t=11 (16) ABC Radio National, Stephen Crittenden interviews Sam Harris. (17) Banishing the Green-Eyed Monster http://old.richarddawkins.net/articles/1926-banishing-the-green-eyed-monster (18) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pG01ASbgyM 19 The sayings and opinions of atheist Peter Singer in Sex with Animals: http://fixedreference.org/en/20040424/wikipedia/Peter_Singer 20 See: http://www.atheismresearch.com (21) Link to study: http://www.investigatingatheism.info/meaning.html However, it has recently broken down and can be viewed from an archive site: https://web.archive.org/web/20131102071416/http://www.investigatingatheism.info/meaning.html (22) Kanita Dervic, et al, "Religious Affiliation and Suicide Attempt", Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;161(12):2303-8. Ahmed Hassan — Source: Brahin Center website - Posted on 2015-06-05 (archived at the Internet Archive) https://braheen.com/articles/sociology/المواطن-الملحد-خطر-الإلحاد-على-المجتمع