Brutal reduction of human population.

Brutal reduction of human population. *Note: This article is from the book (War on Man) for more please review the book. Environmental anti-humanism has also brought to light a monstrous Malthusianism, which seeks to drastically reduce the number of human beings in the world. (1) Before we proceed further, let us be clear. I am not criticizing here voluntary family planning, which I admit helps a lot to lead a better and more prosperous life. But providing people with the means to determine the number of children is not the same as undermining the size of a family through the force of the law and radical extermination schemes; that’s what I’m focusing on here. As we’ll see, advocates and jurists from very high places advocate highly unethical population policies, in the name of the environment. Jonathan Burritt, former chairman of the UK’s Commission on Sustainable Development, has promoted increased abortion as a way to save the planet, even to the point of sacrificing the well-being of patients in order to bear the costs of this policy. The Times of London reported: In a warning from the government’s environmental adviser: couples with more than two children are “irresponsible” people because they create a burden on the environment. Jonathan Burritt, who chairs the government’s Commission on Sustainable Development, says contraception and abortion must be put at the heart of anti-global-war policies. For example, in the question-and-answer section of his famous speech, Bianca praised the authoritarian government of the Republic of China for its censorship efforts to apply a “one-child” policy to its entire population: “The reason why China can turn the tide, and it will become the new superpowers of the world, is because it is a police state, people can be forced to apply the law and stop reproducing.”2 Unfortunately, as we will see in this book, Bianca is not the only voice here, although China’s policy has repeatedly been exposed as including forced abortions, female infanticide, and the release of forced eugenics to combat disability. As illustrated in The Wall Street Journal, Susan Greenhal’s book, Raising Global Citizens: Cultivation in China, details the consequences. Greenhall explains that, in its quest to find “superhuman” mothers and children, Beijing has set aside social, cultural, and political factors and discriminated against entire categories of low-quality individuals: “rural populations, rural-urban migrants, women, minorities, and those with substandard bodies” as well as “perverts” such as gays and unmarried partners.” Forced eugenics is also China's official policy, and thus the people fell prey to overt sexual selection: Official pressure to reduce and “improve” births has led to infanticide and selective abortion, which in turn has led to a gender gap in births of at most 120 boys per 100 girls. Many Chinese men, therefore, will find no wives, and fewer older people will have girls to comfort and support. It is amazing how such a small cultural deviation attracts the attention of those caught up in the ecological frenzy. The idea that human beings are the enemy of the Earth seems more radical and crude in the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (VHEM), where the Earth has the highest priority. It looks like a paradise, doesn't it? Gaia has completely cured the human virus. Without the presence of human beings who are too involved in the affairs of others on Earth, all other species will have a fair chance of survival. Of course, it's not that simple, but just for fun, let's imagine an impossible dream: all human sperm suddenly and permanently lose their viability and usefulness - no fertilized human egg begins the process of mitosis to form a zygote - and the embryo does not turn into that sacred embryo, so the process is not completed and sentenced to life imprisonment. We will not need any concepts, and we will not start to implement them... The benefits will automatically start to be redirected to both the vital sphere and the human resources. Don't laugh. I've written many books about that paradise that will stand out in our own backyard. Of course, no one will know about it, because the remaining species will be unable to appreciate the sunset or enjoy the absolute sight of walking in the ancient forests. [*] Sarah-Kate Templeton, Two children should be limit, says green guru, Feb 1, 2009, The Sunday Times. 1 Malthusianism is the idea that population growth is likely to be Asian while the growth of food supply or other resources is linear, eventually reducing living standards to the point of causing the death of a population. The idea derives from the political and economic thought of the Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus, as established in his 1798 An Essay on the Principle of Population. “Malthusianism,” Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malthusianism. (2) Rick Pearcey, “Dr. ‘Doom’ Pianka Speaks,” The Pearcey Report, April 6, 2006, http://www.pearceyreport.com/archives/2006/04/transcript_dr_d.php/. (3) Susan Greenhalgh, Cultivating Global Citizens: Population in the Rise of China (Harvard University Press, 2010). (4) Jonathan Mirsky, “China’s Dreams of Superior Children,” The Wall Street Journal, Jan. 2, 2011, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704735304576057300258180310.html. (5) Voluntary Human Extinction Movement, http://www.vhemt.org/. (6) http://www.vhemt.org/success.htm#popshrink. - Weasley Smith. — Source: Brahin Center website - Published on 2018-09-04 (archived at the Internet Archive) https://braheen.com/articles/sociology/الخفض-الوحشي-لتعداد-البشر