Cinema and the unconscious: popular discourse of atheism

Cinema and the unconscious: popular discourse of atheism Note: Many information and quotes were taken from specialized movie websites, such as IMDb, some atheist sites, and a group of movie trailers. It should be noted that our times between work and advocacy are too valuable to waste in tracking the details of atheism on screens, but we mentioned the public as evidence of private, and a few of them as evidence of many, and mentioned the words of the people on them without the need to see them all. Introduction There is no doubt that the arts are one of the most powerful means of expressing ideas and beliefs among humans since ancient times, and the life of one of us today is hardly unaffected by any of its forms at least, especially with the enormous development of media and communication techniques, which has gained greater abilities to influence and spread among people, especially visual media, such as images and movies, which have been on the list of the most influential means indisputably, adding to the thinking mind and to the hearing ear another dimension that increases the depth and length of the human eye. Visual media has evolved from mere (a statue), (a drawing), (an advertisement) or (a cartoon); to become (a photograph) since 1826, and through the emergence of movies (animation) or (cartoons), and then the emergence of the world of computer games and the market (video C) and dedicated devices for professional games such as (Xbox) and (PlayStation), ending with a large number of media channels, news, video, and advertising. In what are called mind control specialists, many people are already – whether they feel it or not – slaves to Media Slaves. Outcasts and homosexuals Since these visual media have such enormous attractiveness and power in influence and speed in spreading, it was found that more than thought of exploiting them since their emergence and until now are those excluded, gay or hated groups of societies, because of the need, more than others, to improve their image, or to promote their lies and ideas unacceptable among people, or to make some kind of familiarity between them and viewers to accept their presence among them at least. Atheism is one of the most rejected or anomalous categories among nations of different religions and cultures, how not; it is the absurd and nihilistic doctrine in its truth and in its material origin that is incompatible with human humanity. Even in its essence, it is contrary to the meanings of their moral values, principles and moral obligations, so you will not always find it only in the least adopted and accepted doctrines among countries, where the proportion of atheists - who deny the existence of a god - A picture of the atheist Professor Lawrence Krauss, showing on his clothes the famous equation of atheism (2 x 2 x 5), which honestly summarizes for us the extent of the anomaly of intellectual and scientific atheism to which they are aimed, against every mental axiom among people, and the extent of manipulation of absolute truths no matter how clear - such as the concepts of morality, good and evil, for example - to make them relative in the eyes of people, it is no wonder then even to find aversion of them abroad. One of the facts of this growing hatred is the study by Professor Will Gervais and colleagues, published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, about why they distrust the treatment of atheists. The Washington Post, “Why Do Americans Still Dislike Atheists” For comparison, after decades of intense media distortion of everything Islamic, in a large country like America, atheists today jumped to the top of the list of haters there, with 39.6% (against Muslims 26.3%), and news sites such as the famous news site Junkie Post, citing a study at the University of Minnesota (5), in an explicit title of significance: Research finds that Atheists are Most Hated and Distrusted Minority. Therefore, atheism did not fail to reserve its seat in the riding of those visual media; in order to take advantage of the power and ease of its spread, to gain the largest possible base of followers or sympathizers, and to compensate for its continued inability to advocate for itself among people because of its spiritual void and empty life and material content, because the sum of what it offers them is that they are not equal in this existence, neither at the moment of their birth nor after their death, but they are a group of material atoms tomorrow. Why focus on film in this study? (1) Because hearing is stronger than just reading, and then seeing and seeing is stronger than just hearing and longer than staying and branching in memory, so people interact with the visual news is much stronger than just reading or hearing about it, and the honorable talk that Imam Ahmed directed about the Prophet (may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him) has pointed out to that meaning in his saying: "Not news is like seeing" (Al-Masjid 5374). (2) The enormous influence of film on changing perceptions and opinions in general, and in changing the perception of people to the excluded or gay groups in particular, was a proven and well-known influence, Jews, for example, despite their morals and bad reputations over the long centuries, which made them ostracized among the most nations - and who read the world novel (The Merchant of Venice) of the famous (Willem Shakespeare), and described it to the greedy Jewish merchant (Shelluk), they could use it. Until their image changed for most people in Europe and America in particular,6 until they became the title of human suffering, injustice and surrender to murder in silence, Jewish directors – headed by Steven Spielberg – succeeded in carving landmarks in the award-winning world cinema films such as Schindler's List, the 1993 Saving Private Ryan, and the 1997 Italian film La vita. Therefore, one of the words of the director of the films (Omar al-Mukhtar) and (the message) in both Arabic and English versions, the late international director (Mustafa al-Akkad)7 saying: “For the price of a single plane or ship you can change the world’s view of you.” (3) Also while we find the reader or listener is usually sufficiently aware of what to choose before reading or hearing it, and that the character (writer), (fianc ) or (radio) is always known direction and methodology, it is very different with movies, which change the orientation of its members -directors or actors - each time depending on the story and the scenario chosen to produce it, taking into account that the largest proportion of the choice of film. A one-minute scene from Watchmen 2009, where from the center of a movie, supposedly adventures and science fiction, we find one of its characters (D. Manhattan) on Mars, in front of a large, accurate and complex body, like giant clock gears, to say in a strange disregard for the mind of the average viewer: They claim their labors are to build a heaven, yet their heaven is populated by horrors. Perhaps the world is not made. Perhaps nothing is made. A clock without a craftsman. It's too late. Always has been, always will be. Too late. Perhaps the world is not a creature, perhaps nothing is a creature; a clock without a maker. One of the youth states that he did not stick to his memory after watching that film years ago and until today only this translated phrase, where the fallacy (begging the question) was practiced surprisingly and shockingly to his instinct, by presenting one of the mental impossibilities, the idea of a watch without a maker, as if it is something natural recognized by the tongue of a man. (4) It is also known that each work of art is a work (unidirectional); that is, things are presented in it from the point of view of only one eye, which is the viewer's point of view, where he is the only one who decides its events and positions, and he is the only one who paints the image of the oppressed from the oppressor, and identifies the strong side of the argument from the weakest, the good from the ugly, and the beginning of the end, so he is the only controller of what will be shown to the receiver, as well as the gate. (5) The most dangerous thing in these films, if presented on official channels to reach as many people as possible, where they are not removed from their intellectually malicious passages, similar to what is deleted from their sexual passages, and thus we see the depth of their impact, they will not address a certain group of people, such as intellectuals, or will not address only adults who have been taught by the experiences of life and their suspicions, but will be seen by some age groups who accept and listen to them. Of people. The Impact of (Traditional) Films on Changing Perceptions and Beliefs The most powerful effect of movies is known as "imitation", where the role models are presented to the viewers directly or indirectly, and as is known, one of the simplest fundamentals of education is the formation of role models - hence the meaning of the word education in Japan (Kyo-eku ), where (Eko) means to raise the child and (Kyo) means to encourage imitation. (1) Either instantaneously, shockingly, because of a saying, a scene, or even the whole content of the film, changing the life of the viewer, perhaps to the end of his life. (2) It is slow or gradual, depending on the depth of the idea that is leaked to the mind of the viewer, or the result of a psychological system based on repeated viewing of the particular object to plant familiarity with it and adopt it, such as repeating scenes of sex, scenes of indifference to the feelings of others, scenes of murder, torture and blood, or scenes of contempt for religion and morality. The stimulation of imitation occurs if the ideas of the film match with: (underlying emotions) or (hidden inclinations) or (desire to prove the equalization and ability to simulate) within the same scenes, then the film encourages him to direct or show them on the ground - whether good or evil - as the following tragic example. Natural Born Killers (NBK-1994), one of the most famous American films that influenced many young people and teenagers around the world to commit murders and heinous massacres in their communities over the course of 14 years, either in vain or in search of fame, as happened with the criminals in the events of the film, is just one of dozens of examples of film imitating crimes. One of these heinous crimes, which results from the influence of teenagers lost in life by the absurd and bloody ideas of the film (NBK), the crime that took place in the US state of Colorado April 20, 1999,8 and famous (Columbine High School massacre), which killed 12 students and professors by the duo Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold incident, and here I quote two psychological notes. "When I go NBK and people say things like "Oh, it was so tragic," or "oh he is crazy!" or "It was so bloody", just because your mommy and daddy told you blood and violence is bad, you think it's a f***g law of nature? Wrong, only science and math are true, everything, and I mean every f***g thing else is Man made. Before I leave this worthless place, I will kill whoever I deem unfit for anything at all, especially life". And talk does not need to be explained, where we see the extent of absurdity and nihilism that dominated the boy and encouraged him to take out the film (NBK) and others, until it grew in his sick imagination, to be established with time - and with repeated viewing - that there is no meaning and no value to human life, but not to any value or absolute meaning in life except for material science and mathematics only, and therefore will eliminate all that finds senseless around him, especially life itself! Also referring in his memoirs to the day of the promised massacre – April 20, he wrote that it would be the holy morning of April for the movie (NBK): "The Holy April morning of NBK." His friend Klebold, who was in a state of deep depression, also wrote in his diary before the massacre that he was stuck in humanity, and that he may have walked out of it to freedom with Eric and the NBC: "I'm stuck in humanity. Maybe going NBK with Eric is the way... I hope we kill 250." How are atheistic ideas passed on in visual media? Perhaps it is obvious that the word "atheism" is still a strange word and alienated by their instincts in the ears and eyes of most people, and that if we exclude this category of obsessive attention to every gay and strange, the impact of the word in the hearts of believers can still automatically distract them from their direct propaganda materials such as their books and films, which our magazine - the magazine of proofs - and others accept the scientific and philosophical response to. In the form of "people's atheism" if you will, which has come to distinguish those who are fascinated by such superficial ideas from others, and even to the extent that we find those who do not know the supplies of material atheism, or those who do not know the difference between positive and negative atheism, or between strong and weak atheism, or even the difference between atheism and agnosticism itself, or those who defend Satan - who supposedly does not believe in its existence at all. That's why their science-covering documentaries, like those produced by Discovery Channel and National Geographic, and Jonathan Miller and Richard Dawkins' film series, which pass over evolution and the myths of chance and philosophical fabrications to religions, will be excluded. We can divide the ways of passing atheistic ideas into the following elements: First: exploit the gaps of self, mind and imagination. Second: Dumping in the display of lusts and nudity and love for adultery and treason. Third: portraying existence and life as absurd, nihilistic and null. Fourth: Overthinking science fiction to marginalize the capabilities of the Creator God. Fifth: Exploiting the irrationalities of distorted religions as a pretext for atheism. Sixth: Representing God indirectly to shed atheistic visions on him. Seventh: Using the lies of evolution as a gateway to atheism. And let's start together to review each point, focusing on the role of cinema as we have said, and be aware that all we will mention is a few of many, and that we were not impressed with the matter as some will think, who may see some of the works we will show are (normal) and do not tolerate what we will mention about them, but we say: This research is the result of a focused period of study and review of the writings of a large number of atheists who are themselves small, and their recognition of reasons. First: Exploiting the gaps of self, mind and imagination Where those who think that the impact of the visual media is confined within the limits of the drawing board or the dimensions of the television or computer screens, the fact that, as a human expression, they go far beyond the limits of all this, to address the depths of the human psyche directly - areas of strength and weakness or gaps - and it addresses the horizons of imagination unlimited to the viewer as well. As for atheism, it is always looking for the keys to the vulnerabilities of the self or the imagination, which enable it to pass on its toxins, just as a computer virus does. (1) It may exploit sexual desires, such as naked posters or scenes, to corrupt the religion of the viewer, or attract him to similar works, or to plant ideas through them, and may exploit in the same context the love of the viewer to comedies or police, or action or adventures or science fiction, or the fondness of some horror films, killing, slaughter and torture. (2) The lust of some may also be used to rebel against ordinary conditions and orders, or even to rebel against the nature of their sex as male or female, because with an emphasis on this quality, they may end up – with some psychological influences and logical fallacies – accepting the idea of rebellion against the God himself, and even exaggerating arrogance and obstinacy, and portraying all this as courage, pride and dignity in rejecting slavery and obedience to God, and his divinity, as in the films depicting the gods. (3) Atheism may even take advantage of the lust of some to appear and distinguish between peers, even if they are vilified and gay, similar to the Arabi who peed in the well of Zamzam to make his name famous among the tribes! Such personalities are the most acceptable to the atheism and the most persistent to show it, not hide it, and torment – all agony – when you ignore it or show apathy. (4) Other times you find them exploit the lust of some in the role of the rational and logical character among people to the extreme, they present the heroes of the artistic works of the characters of the series or movies in the form of atheist or nonreligious rational, who believes only in science, and rejects all the unseen religions, where this attractive image close to himself tries to imitate them in the same manner as the development of the genius who has noticed what no one has observed throughout the centuries, or in the image of the genius. We see this in their drawing of the characters of their most famous daily series - the series was chosen here because it has the longest effect with the length of viewing -, such as the figure of the educated young believer (Sheldon Cooper) from the series Big Bang Theory, which they deliberately show in the image of the savoir-faire believing in evolution, in exchange for showing others around him in the form of ignorant simple believers in the divine or religious creation. Where he says his luck in being with them: Sheldon Cooper: This is my home now. Thanks to you my career is over and I'll spend the rest of my life here in Texas, trying to teach evolution to creationists. Mary: You watch your mouth, Shelly. Everyone's entitled to their opinion. Sheldon Cooper: Evolution isn't an opinion, it's fact. Mary: And that is your opinion. Sheldon Cooper: [to the others] I forgive you. Let's go home. And like the group of intelligent atheist doctors, they decorate them for millions, led by Dr. George House, from House, as a whole accused of irrationality: "Rational arguments don't usually work on religious people, otherwise there would be no religious people". And Dr. Perry Cox, from Scrubs, and his expression of the absurdity of life: "Nurse Laverne Roberts: Everything happens for a reason. Dr. Cox: Are you really trying to tell me that things like New Orleans, AIDS, sugar–free ice cream, crack babies, Hugh Jackman, and cancer all happen for a reason? Because I'm sorry, I'm... I'm just not buying that". A psychology student, Britta Perry, of Community, who promotes moral atheism, in a malicious attempt to break the close relationship between atheism and lack of moral authority as people know it, once telling her religious friend Shirley: "Yeah, but your religion isn't the same as morality, and calling me immoral because I'm atheistic is religious persecution". Even the characters of the cartoon did not escape this absurdity, where they presented the figure of the young scientific intellectual (Daria), from the series Daria, which teaches (doubt) in everything, until she says her atheistic sentence that is attached to the mind of the scenes fascinated by: "Until I see some pretty convincing evidence… I think we are on our own". (5) The trap they often fall into is the trap of showing (evidence) that there are errors in religions, or (evidence) that there are things in the universe that are useless – in their eyes – or (evidence) that only science can be physically sensed, and this is fraud itself; because even experimental science is based on inferences and deductions, it depends only on observing the effects of things based on the fact that there is nothing happened except because of the years. Its existence has only been confirmed in the last three years. This is how atheists exploit one of the most famous logical fallacies with these victims here, the fallacy of Sharpshooter, in which the owner selects as much evidence from his point of view to accept something, and leaves many times more than he does not want. (6) Perhaps one of the most famous psychological methods to destabilize the belief of (normal) scenes in images or cartoons or movies is the use of (shock) style of religion, which is the deliberate (insult) of the holy sky is seen openly and publicly, such as dozens or hundreds of pictures and cartoons that they try to publish in Facebook, Twitter and forums, or such as scenes of short studied and deliberate in some films, which may amount to ridicule of the same God. Such a psychological method - malicious and sudden - depends on breaking the fear and holiness in the mind of the viewer (normal), especially when those who have the misconception that no one can insult or challenge God, but death or disgrace will follow him (immediately), forgetting that God claims in the Holy Quran that one of the ignorant may insult them, so do not insult those who call instead of God, because God is an enemy without knowledge. In a scene no more than two minutes from the 2011 film The Grey, the film’s protagonist looks up at the sky, uttering foul words to his god because of his ordeal and lack of answer to his prayers. And as much as they shake themselves already by such scenes studied and deliberate to stimulate the fools to (imitate them), as much as the wise overcome them after a while, and after thinking about them slowly, where they find several logical fallacies as we have mentioned them: A fallacy (Hasty Generalization); results from the method of (gatekeeper) and not to show the film to the idea of many other human cases, in which they pray to their God and respond to them instantaneously if required by his will and wisdom, and even with the atheists themselves who deny him; as happened with his daughter (Dr. Lawrence Brown), where the response to the momentary call to his daughter (Dr. Lawrence Brown). The purpose of the life of this world is to test and destroy and show faith in God despite adversity, Allah says in the Qur’an as an example: * I think people should be left to say that they believe in Allah and that they are not deceived. * We have tried those before them, so let them know those who believe and let them know the history of the liars. C. The fallacy (false reason); which in this scene came in the form: I did not respond to my call, so God does not exist. As if it were a duty for God to respond to (all) the claims of all human beings, even if they are mentally contradictory; as if two good people call them for example to marry one woman, or even if they contradicted his will to delay the answer or the plague, and show many evil people. D. It follows from the same earlier fallacy that the hero asked his God to show him a miracle, perhaps as they returned to many deceiving Christian programs in America and the world; If God did not reveal it to him, then he would not exist, and this is more surprising than the question of the previous prayer itself, because if it is achieved for all people, then the meaning of the test of faith and disbelief in life will disappear, saying: “And if your Lord had willed, all those on earth would have believed.” Their necks are submissive to them” (Poets 4). (7) There is another method of deviousness, but it shows us the most important loophole of the soul receptive to atheism; which is the predisposition to ridicule religion or God, otherwise it would not have responded to such naivety or (equivocation) in subtraction, especially using the easiest logical fallacies; such as the fallacy (false analogy), or the fallacy (confusion of the following) Where you mock the confidence of believers in God and mock the phrase In God We Trust famous to the Americans, and written on the currency of the paper dollar, we find the maker of the drawing manipulates that moral meaning - that is, trusting God - to wear a material clothing naive only fools like him, where he asks who trusts God to stand with his arms to his sides, then leans back and he trusts that God will not make him fall on his back. Of course, the sane does not need to show the absurdity of this logic and its contradiction with the simplest principles of faith, which is that God has created the world for us to go originally causes and physical laws, and that the miracles and verses in them are the exception and not the rule, and know that the report of this fact does not need to invent believers today to manage a defect did not know them in their faith, but translates to us the extent of arrogance of the minds of followers. The Edge (2011) is one of the most famous films that tried to polish atheism morally, and show it as the appearance that sacrificed his life for his beloved, which is the wife of his neighbor the Christian believer who cheated with her, and show it as a (strong argument) versus the believer (weak argument), by drawing the script for the dialogues studied in advance, in which the believer says that perfection in the creation of creatures and the accuracy of the universe indicates the Creator. Despite the filth of the story of the film, which justifies us the most despicable stories of infidelity; one of them is the betrayal of the atheist to his religious Christian neighbor with his wife, who decided to seduce him in retaliation for his neighbor's idea of homosexuality, and the other is the faithful policeman who betrays his wife and gives him two sons, and then knows that he does not give birth, and if the people are not guilty, it turns out that she betrayed him with his younger brother, so. As for the argument that we see the effects of the actor and do not see the actor; this is already obvious, from the priorities of human thinking and experimental science itself, denied only by the deranged owners (2 2 5). Here scientists talked about gravity, and calculated in their equations and laws from the mere effects, and did not know it as a force of forces or seen or touched. As for the argument of those who die and are not informed of the messages of Allah at any time or place, such as the death of a young person and those who do not receive a message or a distorted language, and the insane, the deaf and the old age who do not understand what is being said to them, they will be tested on the Day of Resurrection, as stated in the correct Hadiths of the Prophet, Allah is the One who chooses for each person his test. C- As for the problem of evil, if the atheist is fair with himself, there is no connection between it and the question of the existence of the Creator or not; because the existence of the Creator is examined by other evidences, such as the impossibility of sequencing causes indefinitely, and like that everything is complex and complex and accurate and has an end, it must be a maker .. and so on. Let’s look at the mental possibilities to justify evil: Probability (the first) is that the Creator created the universe and left it, so evil appeared in it, and this is impossible given the lack of each creature of the atom to the galaxy to take care of it at every moment, because according to the tendency of energy to disperse and scatter and spread, to stability and stillness, neither atoms nor galaxies had to exert energy to gather instead of disperse, nor the cell to divide and multiply instead of dying. And the second possibility, that the Creator wants good, but cannot prevent evil in the world, and this is stranger than the previous possibility; because he who creates the whole universe has the reasons to eliminate anything that causes evil in him, such as killing the bad guys, or stopping the plagues of nature from earthquakes, volcanoes and so on if he wants. The (third) possibility is that the creator of this universe is already evil, and wants evil to exist in him, and this destroys the idea that the existence of evil is completely linked to the Creator! But it is also a false possibility, because our awareness of the perfection and beauty that we, the creators of good, know about evil, is impossible to instil in us a God who does not have it, as well as because good is more perfect than evil, he is the perfect Creator, because evil is motivated by a lack. The (final) possibility, that the Creator can prevent all the evils of the world, but leaves it only to show the essences of the souls of the good and the bad on the ground, to hold them accountable for their actions, not just for their knowledge. It is the friend of the Almighty Almighty Creator, and it is the result of the victory of good over evil always, no matter how long. Second: Dumping in the display of lusts and nudity and justifying adultery and adultery It is one of the broadest doors leading to the rejection of religions psychologically in the near or long term, and therefore, to deny the Creator himself if the disbelief of the fallen falls from irreligion to atheism. Where its method depends on hanging the hearts of the weak faith and piety of various physical and sexual desires, if they are accustomed to and familiar with them, and perhaps lusted in them or addicted to them or actually fell in them, then they inevitably collide with what their religions reject, such as sexual relations outside marriage, such as the freedom to strip and reveal injustices, homosexuality and betrayal of husbands, etc. All of this need not be demonstrated today by the names of certain artistic works, as it has spread to the movies cartoons and anime for children and adolescents, where is the sense of responsibility towards them? Pictures of three of the most famous American cartoon characters today: the first, for the alien Roger Smith, from the series American Dad. And the second, for the dog (Brian Griffin), from the series Family Guy. Both are obsessed with sex, alcoholic, and mocking of religions. The third character is (Quagmire) The title of the series is (Quagmire) We also see the association of atheism with homosexuality in children's cartoon characters, such as previous series, and to love them in it, and motivate them to imitate it. These gay characters are also featured as protagonists of popular teen and youth-influenced series, such as Oscar Martinez in The Office, and high school student Kurt Hummel in Glee, both openly gay and atheist. And of course, both are cute funny and successful and loving. It has become ordinary today in games or movies to include one or more scenes of explicit sex or naked nakedness, so that it was the first reason why I was distracted from pursuing such works for more than 15 years, since if one wants to cleanse his heart and vision, he should clear his eyes and his wounds first, and perhaps one of the dangers of looking at these dirt is in the continuous feeding of imagination and the subconscious mind with the details of the positions of nakedness and adultery and even. As for the believer, he is supposed to avoid (as much as he can) such trials and tests, in which he may be entrusted with himself, and then what weakens man in the face of lusts, Allah wants to turn to you and those who follow lusts want to be inclined. Witness; that with all this raging lusts, and encourage shamelessness from them, and decorate interaction with them, and pass them in e-mails and relay them in tweets and Facebook, and if as a kind of (opening) and (liberation) and (Roshenah), it will inevitably be accompanied with time - involuntarily - feelings (rejection) psychologically to the idea of accountability, and considering them as taboo and chaos If you wanted to account for that degenerate secularism I would have said to you: I asked him to jump out of the window, and I did not ask him to fall to the ground and he would die. The real role of secularism is to demand that anyone who trusts it “stands with their arms at their sides” and then “leans back”, with the certainty that it “will not make them fall on their backs”! Just as alcohol, drugs, prostitution and homosexuality are allowed in their communities, and they know for sure how terrible they are on every health, psychological and social level. But like the civilized method of manufacturing death and gifting it to you in a neat box that says: "Smoking leads to death"! Or writing (for adults only or -18 or R or NC-17 ... etc.) on movie posters, as if he did not raise his age before the age of a certain adult will not be affected by such misfortune. The Devil's Advocate (1997) is perhaps the best example of the freedom of death with warning, where Al Pacino plays the role of the devil in the image of John Milton, the great lawyer from New York, who wants to seduce the ambitious young man (Kevin Lomax) to work with him, although the events of the end of the film make it clear that his main goal is to highlight the permanent conflict between Satan and man, and that man always has the opportunity to choose and win. That is, the dramatic context allowed him to have a fair dialogue between the two sides of the equation - good and evil - so he gave way to the evil side, and silenced the good side; thinking that the end is enough. And it is of course not enough, which is what we are witnessing from the adoption of some young atheist images and statements and the character of the devil embodied by the Pacino on their pages on various social networking sites, where the devil says in the end scene - and I apologize for the obscene words at the end: Who are you carrying all those bricks for anyway? God? is that it? Well, I'll tell you. Let me give you a little inside information about God. God likes to watch. He's a prankster. Think about it. He gives man instincts. He gives you this extraordinary gift, and then what does He do, I swear for His own amusement, his own private, cosmic gag reel, He sets the rules in opposition. It's the goof of all time. Look but don't touch. Touch, but don't taste. Taste, don't swallow. Ahaha. And while you're jumpin' from one foot to the next, what is he doing? He's laughin' His sick, f***g * off! He's a tight–***! He's a SADIST! He's an absentee landlord! Worship that? NEVER! When we ask a question of every mind here, is God forbidden to man except for immorality, such as adultery that destroys the plough, offspring, waste of rights, destroys the family entity, family spirit and building society, such as usury and blackmailing the poor for the benefit of the rich, and such as cheating, lying, betrayal and hypocrisy, and such intoxicants drugs that cause the mind of its owner. Makes him aimless, kills, steals, hits his car, commits adultery, rapes even his mother, sister, daughter, or others, and he doesn't know? The question is more revealing than the simple argument: Did God give desires to man, except that he was allowed the good Halal enough for him from marriage, food and clothing? “And forbid men and women from looking at the forbidden things, and forbid immolation, and nakedness, and shameful mixing, and then enjoin upon them the ease of marriage, and marry the days of you and the righteous among your servants and your Imams, if they are poor, Allah will enrich them out of His grace; and Allah is All-Wise, All-Knowing.” Third: To portray existence and life as absurd, nihilistic and null. Another parallel door to the door of immersion in lusts, lies through the publication of works that manipulate the concepts of life and death, the lie of chance and randomness that results in the universe and life, or the myths of evolution that robs man of his centrality among creatures, or mix the illusion of truth, or remove the distinctions between the mental and the mental impossible, or underestimate the humanity of humans and their feelings, emotions and morals, without which they degrade (KNB) Where the field has been open since the eras to the art of every mental patient, and every manipulator of human life, in the invention of a story of a new computer game or a new film - cartoon or cinema - destroys them existential balance within the mind of man, to open a thousand doors of disbelief and atheism, or ethics leading to them. Starting from car games, which whenever the heroes of the game, namely thieves, kill more innocent people in the streets and torture them while escaping from the police, they get a bigger Score, through hundreds of games and other films that are filled with mixing the world of the jinn with myths of ghosts and wandering spirits, or filled with stories of magic that mix miracles with manipulations of demons, so that the abilities of God are attributed to others in the mind of the player or scenes, or also filled with stories (dead) With the pain of the victims and the blood and body that fills all around you in the game or in the movie, some of them have even become explicitly calling for the rituals of black magic and the worship of the devil, in a way that drives every sane to wonder: What is the purpose behind the production of such psychological and social calamities?! It ends with a large collection of brilliant fantasy ideas, which are formulated in movies, works and magazines (anime), in which everything that is unseen in religions - starting from the Creator and passing through angels and demons and death - is replaced by the world of spirits, energy and superpowers, which are the deposits of religion in the Japanese, who are overshadowed by the fatal atheism today, and the highest rate of suicide in the world, or a large group of films cast plot head, to overturn the concepts of life. (1) (Tron), in its two versions; the old, 1982 and the new, Tron: Legacy 2010, which indirectly passes the absurd idea that we are inside a large computer game complex, such as video games C. Also (Truman Show 1998), which feeds the same previous idea, but with the depiction of the real God – let it be so – in the image of the director enjoying the positions and algebraic reactions of the human being, we can not want it. What is noticeable in this type of film is that it feeds the atheistic consumption of time, for the short life of the rational; because it never gives the viewer, superficially, the answer to the logical question: and then what? That is, what after you have shown us these fanciful ideas of the illusion of existence, and you have moved the ball to the playground of another higher or real existence, what after this other existence?! Do not the rational know that everyone who did not create himself is necessarily a creature: “Or were they created out of nothing or were they the creators” (Phase 35). Therefore, we, as believers in God Almighty, believe in the Creator who was not created by anyone, and in whom all things were not created. (2) He plays the same chord of the tone (skepticism) in the axioms, and even questioning the existence of the human self itself, in preparation for accepting (2 2 5), other films specialized in mixing reality with fiction and illusion of truth, where the writer with the professionalism of the director moves scenes between real and imaginary situations, or different and overlapping moments, in preparation for dissolving the differences between relative and absolute, and between the guessing and certainty, the opening of the hour. For example, the 1999 film Fight Club, in which the viewer gets lost with his hero, the 2001 psychological thriller The Others, and many other films with which interaction increases exponentially, with 3D holographic techniques, which may already provoke some psychopaths or lost in life, to develop diseases of delusion or doubt the existence of themselves. (3) Parallel universes or infinite cycles of life. Whether they are time cycles, such as the blasphemous idea of reincarnation, which was recently represented by Cloud Atlas 2012, or Source code 2011, in which the film's protagonist solves in other people's bodies in the last 8 minutes of their lives, or ideas of time travel to the past or the future, as presented by a long series of films, Physics itself, such as the ideas of time travel or traveling through black holes to other parallel universes, has been led by atheist Stephen Hawking since 1975. (4) or infinite spatial cycles, including the idea of common worlds such as the film (The Golden Compass) 2007, and the most dangerous is the idea of worlds that are inside worlds repeatedly and illogically infinitely in a crude and open intellectual futility, although the film - as usual - can not his idea of the sequence of worlds to infinity to eliminate the idea (and must) the existence of an eternal creator that does not create and does not create, otherwise began to exist? We note that all the ideas we have reviewed do not have a single evidence to support it physically, experimentally or scientifically, and that this is the most dangerous entrance from which atheistic ideas emerge on smart people who have nothing to guide their intelligence or assumptions unfortunately, and if they understood that it is easy to unleash one of us to imagine what he wants to imagine, but how many of them will correspond to the simplest intuitions and mental possibilities that are possible? I deliberately did not mention works on evolution, which will come at the end of the research, nor the names of games and movies bloodless absurd nihilism, which most of them disgusted and disgusted; because of the seriousness of what is already on the psychological and physical security and the security of societies, but I conclude with you this point with a quick story, about one of the people who fell victim to Trailer naked for one of the scenes of the era in the 1980s, so that you get the film from the Internet and build it. Man that (humanity) robs him through this work, which has no purpose and no purpose but the degeneration of the soul senseless, with the absence of constants and the disappearance of the separations between absolute and relative, which is the prelude to the concept (2:2-5), immediately fled to the house of his relatives to hug his wife and children are surprised, as he felt her day - for the first time - as he told me: How much is a man in this religion! One could have turned a blind eye to these ideas, had I not already met with today’s young people who unfortunately have been struck by these intellectual stains and the absurd, nihilistic vision of existence, by such scenarios and stories. Fourth: Overthinking science fiction to marginalize the capabilities of the Creator God Where capital here manipulates the fascinated with science and its capabilities, while science fiction is already one of the doors of invention and development for the better, and research to discover more secrets of the universe and its laws, but the continuation of this imagination that is opposed to the most basic mental intuitions - such as the creation of life or the revival of the dead - ends up in the field of robbing the Creator God of what can only be attributed to him. (1) There is, for example, the idea of making a man or collecting him, and broadcasting life in him in minutes or moments, and the idea of sympathy to imagine them - the myths of evolution and the emergence of life from millions of years to less than an hour - it is one of the oldest ideas of films with the emergence of the art of cinema, in the film (Frankenstein) in 1910, which did not exceed the same 16 minutes in black and white, which was reworked and produced and directed more. We see in the stories of Frankenstein repeated and repeated a clear disregard for the miracle of the soul and the creation of the competent life of God alone. In the 2012 film Frankenweenie, where they portray the little boy Victor, using lightning electricity, he was able to revive the remains of his dog Sparky, who was run over by a car, and farewell to the concept of the soul, to confirm that life is material. (2) There is also the idea of human genetic cloning – which is promoted by science fiction films in the form of full creation – where they portray the brain as being easier to transmit in the near future and with the development of techniques, but what little is known is that animal cloning experiments have a low success rate, and embryos often die in an early period or shortly after birth, because the DNA transferred from the physical cell is transferred to the empty nucleus with all the limits of disease, and a long time already. Signals, not a storage device, just like a television without which the signals of transmission and electricity will not be received, and if they crash they stop, in a new and decisive blow to atheists and materialists. The 6th Day (1999), an embodiment of all these imaginative and non-scientific exaggerations at the door of cloning, which evolutionists and atheists like to manipulate every period to cultivate a sense of marginalization of one of the characteristics of God, the creation of life, and the same idea is promoted more professionally in many cartoons Anime, especially the rich graphics of the most popular D. (3) Another idea adopted by some science fiction films, is the search for the origins of human beings as coming from other creatures in the universe, such as Prometheus 2012, the name of one of the gods of the ancient Greeks specialized in the creation of life, and this is an implicit recognition of them - if they understand - the impossibility that life on earth has arisen coincidentally and randomly from the second evolution, so they resorted to a new detour aimed at not recognizing the Creator God as their custom, is not the proportion of this life on earth? It reminds us of that stubbornness and that evasiveness of acknowledging a divinely created organism as one of today's most notorious and fanatical atheists, Richard Dawkins, when he was cornered by Jewish broadcaster Ben Stein in the last scene of his remarkable documentary, Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed 2008, by asking him about the miraculousness of his remarkable design. Far away, until it reached a degree of science that enabled it to design the living cell and sow it in our land. The strange thing about Prometheus is that their discovery of the map of stars in more than one different civilization Egyptian, Mayan, Babylonian, Sumerian, and Hawaiian is not directly related, and inevitably led them to conclude that smarter beings the Engineers are the reason for this. Drifters still tell you that there are no signs or traces of the Creator in our lives, and that they need to further discover the universe to make sure that there is a Creator behind it, they claim this despite the billions of crucial evidence under their hands in the cell and its complexity, and in every living being around them, and in the accuracy of this universe that is impossible to randomness and coincidence, as admitted by astronomers and physicists, until they called it (the carefully prepared universe Fine) "An atheist is someone who is certain that God does not exist, someone who has compelling evidence against the existence of God. I know of no such compelling evidence. Because God can be relegated to remote times and places and to ultimate causes, we would have to know a great deal more about the universe than we do now to be sure that no such God exists. To be certain of the existence of God and to be certain of the nonexistence of God seem to me to be the confident extremes in a subject so riddled with doubt and uncertainty as to inspire very little confidence indeed". Carl Sagan may believe in a God if he is the law of the universe! But in this case, there will be no meaning to his worship, because no one will worship the law of gravity, for example, as he said in one of his statements. Now, what do you expect when such a wanderer in life writes the story of a famous science fiction film like Contact 1997?! I also told you that the work of art is a piece of its owner, you find texts in the script of the film that translate us the same blind look, where he is not satisfied with the billions of evidence that live with and in it on the existence of the Creator Almighty, leaving it to launch his heart search in space, so we find like the next naive speech on the mouth of the heroine of the film (Judy Foster), in which the idea of the creator of this universe does not leave a single proof that the existence of believers. Ellie Arroway: So what's more likely? That an all-powerful, mysterious God created the Universe, and decided not to give any proof of his existence? Or, that He simply doesn't exist at all, and that we created Him, so that we wouldn't have to feel so small and alone? (4) Close to that question is the fallacy of inferring the existence of other intelligent aliens in the universe, not necessarily the existence of a creator. The difference between this case and the case of aliens, who planted life on Earth, is that this case speaks of the emergence of other intelligent life - also by chance and evolution - separately from what happened on Earth, which means that the question of the emergence of living organisms anywhere in the universe is a random issue, and does not need a creator in their opinion, and here are other new logical fallacies such as: - A fallacy (civilization based on evidence not yet done), where to date not a single incident has been proven true about the existence of aliens, or even the lies of UFOs, out of hundreds of fabricated stories and rumors that bring big money to their promoters to stimulate tourism and the sale of souvenirs. All of this, as well as the failure of all programs of searching for evidence of any sane life in the universe to this day. - The fallacy (presuppositions), which is to make assumptions unrelated to the result that they want to delude people, such as the assumption that the mere existence of aliens means the absence of the Creator, although the axioms of the mind necessitated - as we have already explained - the impossibility of the existence of something compact, accurate, perfect and canceled only Creator, and that it is impossible for the one who created life on Earth to create the same billions of times in the rest of the universe than we know and what we do not know if we will. Perhaps one of the most prominent films that used this logical fallacy crudely and shamelessly, although as far as I know, and for the first time explicitly confined to it, in the midst of hundreds of alien films, old and new, is the alien Paul (Paul 2011), where the scenario of the film connects the question of the existence of the creator or not to the question of the existence of aliens or not, and the author and director tell us that concept by carefully choosing the characters of the actors, where we find the fanatic Christian father and his daughter (Ruth). And her dirty words, once she threw religion behind her back, that's the whole point of the film. Fifth: Exploiting the absurdities of Christianity and distorted religions as a pretext for atheism This point has an advantage and a disadvantage, as its advantage; it increases the disbelief of many of their religions or humanity, and reveals the inability of their religions to answer many of their questions and confusion about God or the loopholes of their laws, and lead the students of truth from them to the stage of non-religion, which most of them enter into Islam if they search sincerely or discover how many lies and media distortions about Muslims. The disadvantage is that it always uses all kinds of (generalization fallacies) known to attach Islam to all the negatives of other religions, but the impact of this defect and this generalization is now short-lived, because of the rapid expansion of the Internet and communications, and the availability and exchange of real information between humans, away from the lies of official or media trumpets or paid pens in news sites and the Internet. To spread the benefit, I say: Islam is the only religion that agrees with reason, so people did not know a book urging its followers and believers to think and use reason as evidence of faith, like the Quran, because as long as Islam is a religion of truth, there is no truth (mental impossibility) that cannot be accepted, such as the claim that 3 * 1 or 1 * 3, or the claim that 2 * 2 * 5 , or that the complex and complex things come out of matter. We know that God is the Creator of all things, and that He is the Creator of all things, and that He is the Creator of all things, and that He is the Creator of all things, and that He is the Creator of all things. As for those who try to mock the miracles of the Messenger of Islam – and other miracles of the previous messengers – such as mocking the gleaming, Israa and Mi'raj – as Richard Dawkins did in one of his meetings – or cutting the sea, turning the stick into a snake and vice versa, or making the fire cool and peaceful, etc., we say: There is (physically possible); it is all the values, constants and laws with which God created this universe, they are possible, because God had willed to put them in the form of other values and other possible forms to put them. And there (impossible physicist); is our inability (we) to change these values, constants and laws; because it is not in our hands, but God who created it can change it simply so. So all suspicions of this kind are dropped by simply accepting the existence of the Creator. We will not, of course, aim in this study to talk about the details of other religions, especially Christianity as the first religion in America, but we want to clarify some important points that show viewers how to deal with visual media, especially cinematic, these religious issues and represent them in a way that serves the religion and atheism significantly, although sometimes not explicit. 1 For example, the method of “breaking holiness” and “insulting” religious symbols, which secularism abroad allows in the right of the Constitution and the law under the pretext of “freedom of expression”, and which was encouraged by them at first, unfortunately: the Christian churches in the world allowed the person of Christ and the prophets to be embodied in pictures and movies, without regard to their sanctity – because it was one of the fastest means of spreading Christianity and stabilizing it among the general population of nations and their emotional extension. (2) So is the shameful and absurd historical manipulation of the story of any religion under the pretext of (comedy work) or (new or neutral cinematic vision), and that is like the film obscene (Brian Life of Brian) 1979, which presents the story of the life of Christ peace be upon him in the image of the young absurd (Brian), to make fun of Christianity however he wants, and like the film (The Last Temptation of Christ) The Last Temptation of Christ 1988 Unfortunately, such inventions are repeated and multiplied, until they reach the claim that he has a special offspring that lives to this day, such as in the film (Da Vinci code) 2006, and even like the film (Noah), which was released weeks ago to change his religious image among the believers. (3) He also deliberately draws imaginary conflicts between God and Satan, drawing the devil as if he were an equal to God Almighty, and that he is rebelling to this day against the power of God, who sometimes sends him (Jabriel) to wrestle with him, or fights him himself, all in attractive directing techniques and effects and cinematic tricks, to pass the malicious contents to the unconscious in any such movie, such as (Constantine) 2005, or in a comic movie. (4) The formulation of stories of films and scenarios to turn the balance of God and man, or the art of giving man superhuman abilities that rob God of his power or knowledge or equal to them, which is a remnant of ancient Greek myths about gods and humans, but has been diversified and updated today, as in the film (Truman Review), for example, where man eventually overcomes (manufacturer/director) Creator despite all the latter's ways. Or turn the scales of divine destiny and inevitable death, such as the scenes of going back in time to prevent the death of someone, such as one of the scenes of the movie (Superman) 1978, when he flew around the planet to change the direction of his rotation and go back in time before the death of his beloved, and I do not know what changed the direction of the rotation of the earth to go back time, or recently like the series (Final Destination) Since 2000 and beyond. He also turned the concepts of good and evil in the divine heavenly kingdom or the religious ground, such as the appearance of (Iblis) in the image of the oppressed who preaches man, for example, as we passed in the movie Devil's Advocate, or in the image of the one who was not infected by the unjust (distribution of roles) of God only in the role of (evil), although it is not. Odd, that such ideas are planted today in the minds of children from a young age, but in the actions of the expert do not go beyond. (6) Or in the image of the clergy who became the title of the lack of confidence of God - if he existed - and replaced them with the best of them with a heart, and the truest of them is the appearance of (the atheist). We see this clearly in the above-mentioned film (Chip Da Vinci), where they made the granddaughter of Christ in our present day and the bearer of the greatest mystery is a young atheist, and thus the author and director make unfair comparisons between atheism and religion, to continue to the second part of the film. Thus you can expect the messages that are passed throughout the film, in the always bad image of the Church Fathers, especially when the investigation of this case is carried out by the pastor (Kirnan), who is already skeptical of his religion. And close to that picture is also the film (Agora) 2009, and show the ancient Alexandrian Christians in a distasteful picture against reason and science, and God said to the one at the end of this absurdity of the recent opening of the door of the Catholic Church in Rome for the Lord's. Serge: We are still married, in the eyes of God. Josephine: Then He must be blind. (6) At the end of this list is a large series of documentaries, which directly attack the Christian faith, and the sexual corruption in which along with doctrinal fanaticism and the contradictions and distortions of historical texts such as the 2004 film Twist of Faith, which tells the story of one of the victims of sexual abuse from Catholic monks in his youth. Also, the 2006 film Deliver Us from Evil, which deals with the church's actions to cover up one of America's. Of course, I will not mention here – or cite – films that attack Christian groups opposed to homosexuality, or that are promiscuous of polygamy, or those absurd films that use the distortions of Christianity as a pretext to claim that Christ did not exist in the first place. Now, after this tour, we wonder: What is Islam’s position on such attacks to pass on atheism through attempts to criticize it like others? The contemplation of the deliberate distortion of the image of Islam – as a kantra for the propagation of the spirit of atheism or atheism among its followers like others – can clearly confine this distortion to two major pillars, namely: The slander against Islam for violence and terrorism – especially the September 11, 2001 bombings – and then the various slanders about the status of women in Islam, this can be deduced from dozens and hundreds of films, programs and cartoons, which the enemies of Islam deliberately spread in their international media, and in their documentaries, such as Richard Dawkins's film The Origin of All Evil (2008), and the film (Bill Mare) The Lair. I will not spend the lines of this research in the statement of adequate responses to such calumnies and lies, especially that the exaggeration of the lie came contrary to what they were planning; where I paid millions to read more about Islam, so I impressed them with its ethics and laws, but since I am in scientific research speaks statistics and documentation, I will make room for numbers and facts to speak. A) The Book of Islam is the only book that invites Muslims and non-Muslims to look at it to compare it with the distortions and lies of other religions on Allah. The Almighty says: “Do they not consider the Qur’an, even if it was from other than Allah, they would find in it many differences” (Women 82), meaning that we will not find in these distorted books on Allah only a few differences, such as those that occur between humans when they lie to each other, but we will find in them a great difference. B) From here fall all masks fraud and lying to Islam and Muslims, and prejudice hateful against them, which is unfolding day after day at the hands of social networks, and information that revealed to the peoples of the world the lie of alleged Islamic terrorism, and the lie of thousands of images and caricatures in circulation, like booby-trapped turbans, and African women are deceived by the possibility of the Muslim will without education and creativity, and men who ride beauty to the day by the pyramids and heels! Natives of Australia, the Americas, and others who saw them as inferior to animals were enslaved. For all of this, the FBI did not own itself in its official statistics on terrorist attacks from 1980 to 2005, except to reveal the unknown exaggerations that were attached to Muslims and terrorism; 94% of those attacks were not carried out by Muslims. Besides, we in Islam do not claim infallibility for anyone like other religions and then they are shocked after that, we have no infallibility for a king or a prince or a scientist or individual Muslims, so why if they describe Islam as a whole terrorism if some of its members issue what they want, and do not describe like other religions or beliefs?! c) As for the situation of Muslim women, enough lies in the visual media to portray the oppression of women and the fact that they are from the harem, which men keep hidden inside the houses for sexual pleasure only, as explained by the ORIAS summer training series for teachers from kindergarten to twelfth grade (25: 29 July 2011), entitled: (Absent Voices: Experiences of public life in the history of the world, compared to the "Harem" and family building. Therefore, we find that the proportion of entrants and converts to Islam today is more than women, in all countries suffering from the scourge of life without religion in the profession of women there as a body without soul, and as fun and entertainment and temptation and abortion and rape and abuse, and no life and stable family commensurate with her tender passion, and imagine the numbers of women according to the proportion of them in the world according to the first statistics, if we know that the fastest religions and beliefs spread today. The real dismal situation of (non-Muslim) women in secularism and atheism is illustrated by the latest global statistics on Europe – the symbol of civility and women’s liberation – from the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), whose title is Violence against women every day and everywhere. Sixth: Representing God indirectly to remove atheistic visions on him It is an old way to put God in the form of (accountability) or (trial), or to find comfort in conducting a dialogue with him, but away from the direct or crude way, if you will, as we have seen in the past vulgarities of cinema. Therefore, it may take more than one image as decided by the writer to circumvent this request, while acknowledging that all these dialogues are artificial, but they indicate a lack of knowledge of God and religion, the truth, resulting basically. They ask" (Prophets 23). For example, dialogue with the king of death is an indirect alternative to God, where he is sometimes interviewed as the king of command, and other currents interview him in the origin of his orders – which only God has. This issue is old-fashioned from the beginning of authorship and theater, but one of the most famous films she represented was the Swedish film (Det sjunde inseglet) or The Seventh Seal 1957, in which a philosophical dialogue Fantasia skeptical between the hero of the film and death, who came to capture his soul, challenged him before playing (chess). The film, like the usual skeptics, is full of questions that express the wandering and confusion in, and the lack of clarity of the reality of the worldly life in it, as in Christianity all life is based on the doctrine of crucifixion and redemption, and the inheritance of sin, which is not found at all in Islam. (2) The other image deliberately delayed from the past because it is the source of what will come from other images is the projection of the image of God into woven stories to show the objections to it or to show the (deficiencies) of that God from the author’s point of view. We have in our hands a light fantasy film, for young and old alike, although it was produced in 1939, and it is the most successful versions of the film, the first of which was 1925, and the last of 2013, which is the Wizard of Oz, the witch that Dorothy is headed for with her dog who does not have a mind like a human, and the tin man who does not have a heart, and the scarecrow or the magician's imagination. (3) At the same pace played the film (Truman Show) 1998, which we have mentioned before, in which he is portrayed in the greatest studio on earth since his childhood and does not know, which is one of the dirtiest ways to infuse the illusion in the mind of the viewer, to doubt himself or around him, but with time he begins to discover the false representation that surrounds him, even from the closest people to him, who deliberately confine him within the boundaries of this studio. Ignorant, the film has increased at the same pace that it also lies to man, and you can unleash your imagination about what is entrenched in the mind of the viewer by such calumnies and crude fabrications about God Almighty, and the impact on the lives of the victims of such films, and in the end – as in the Wizard of Oz – Truman can reach behind the curtain in spite of the director. Seventh: Using the Lies of Evolution as a Gateway to Atheism We will not dwell on that point either, but we are only interested in reviewing how in the works of art and cinema ideas are passed accepting evolution - which is the gate of great atheism to replace the Creator by chance and randomness, and lead man to believe in the decline of his destiny as a grandson of semi-monkeys - so that our youth will be careful, whether he fell in it or will be subjected to similar in the modern media, which can be summarized in the following: (1) Deliberately dealing with evolution as if it were a fact! Among them are the fossils of the great ape-like ancestor of man, and the depiction of the objectors that they object only because it destroys their religious beliefs in the creation of God Almighty for man with his own hands, and in this way a lot of drawings, cartoons, films and serials, which have already come to fruition with the power of visual media that has been instilling these ideas in the minds of many outside and inside for years. (2) Here I will give you only a few examples, which have been etched in the imagination of many, even though their deception, forgery and fraud have been uncovered for decades, but they do not publish it, and therefore only those who are familiar with the field of evolution scientifically. A. This is like Ernst Haeckel's falsification of embryos, in which, from the mid-nineteenth century, he drew a great similarity between the embryos of vertebrates in their early stages, and later admitted himself to falsifying it on 14/12/1908, where you can see in the following picture drawings (structure) 1847 AD, below which are the real pictures of animal embryos drawn, as explained to Dr. Michael (Richson). Although the confession of Heikal was in 1908, it is still prevalent today in most schools, and even in some of the most famous books of embryo dissection taught by medical students, Frances Heching transmitted the entire text of the confession of Heikal in his book (The Giraffe's Neck, where Darwin made a mistake),19 in which Heikal also stressed that he was not alone in committing fraud in favor of evolution among his peers. The Java Man scandal, which took place in 1981, by synthesizing the bones of the skull of a large monkey and the bones of a human thigh, and then admitted the owner of this fraud 30 years later. The 40-year Peltdown Man scandal (1912 to 1953) in which a complete superstition about a human being was constructed by the synthesis of an adulterated skull of a modern human, chemically treated with a potassium decromet solution for camouflage – the decoding of an orangutan – teeth. In fact, lies and superstitions in evolution do not need more than one great tooth bone, and that is like the scandal (Nebraska Man) in 1922, in which the evolutionists built from this great tooth all their imaginations and assumptions of the form of its owner, so they painted in advance of man like monkeys, and even painted people such methods and drawings of his wife and sons and his parents - optical means remember - and then it appeared in the end that the American tooth was like a monkey. C. Perhaps one of the most famous films that have been exposed to the deepening of this false science was the film (Inherit the wind) The physical lawyer (inherit the mental) in its two versions in 1966 - 1999, which showed a cinematic lengthy debate of the famous American case that took place in 1925, for the teacher (John Scopus), which was known as (the trial Scopus modern) where it took place in the state of Tennessee, and the teacher was accused of studying (development). Drummond) entrusted with the defense of the teacher and evolution, in which he wanted to compare evolution and its alignment with reason against the miracles of the prophets: Henry Drummond: Yes. The individual human mind. In a child's power to master the multiplication table, there is more sanctity than in all your shouted "amens" and "holy holies" and "hosannas." An idea is a greater monument than a cathedral. And the advance of man's knowledge is a greater miracle than all the sticks turned to snakes or the parting of the waters. Not to mention, of course, the deliberate display of opponents of evolution from the jury and those in the hall in the image of reactionary fanatics, to make psychological and emotional clashes with the viewer. H. We can not forget here the role of the famous film series (Planet of the Apes) 1968, in which astronauts find that the dominant and controlling sex are monkeys, and that the ruled sex is a backward race of humans, this film was followed by four parts in 1970-71-72-73, and then it was re-produced like modern techniques and stunning graphics in 2001, and again in 2011, where the story was re-generated from the beginning. This is followed by the second part of 2014, about the domination of this genus already, and all superstitions, as we know now, were based on a huge set of evolutionary lies, especially about man and monkey, where they rely on the dazzling of snapshots and tricks and the thrill of the story in bridging gaps and the plausibility of evolution. Also a series of films in the recent period began to polish and re-popularize, at least emotionally, a person (Charles Darwin), after the emergence of a very low popularity scientifically in recent decades, with the increasing informational complexity of the living cell and its DNA, which Darwin did not know anything about, such as the television series (Charles Darwin's genius) from 2008, which despite all the scientific ignorance that Darwin relied on in his theory and book (the origin of species) However, the atheist evolutionist Richard Dawkins tried to show Darwin, in front of millions of generalists and non-specialists, in the image of his era decades before, by careful observations that he recorded in his trips and visit to the island of Galapagos. Of course, he did not refer to the misfortunes caused to mankind by Darwin's theory of evolution, or the superiority of some human races over each other, as he explained in his second book (the origin of man), where he opened the door wide to the largest, meanest and dirtiest killings and extermination in history in the name of evolution and the superiority of the European white race over the rest of the earth, who are closer to monkeys, gorillas and chimpanzees. It is no wonder, then, that Richard Dawkins once again dodges any question of the application of evolution to people today: “I am against Darwinism, and I cannot stand it when it comes to our lives.” There is also the 2009 film Creation, in which he tries to save the failure of the theory of evolution scientifically by highlighting the (emotional) face of it – and atheism in general – which is Darwin’s sense of the absurdity and cruelty of life, which robbed him of his little daughter death, and his great sadness for her, which was like rethinking life again, with a vision this time free of mercy, that is no place for the merciful God of religions. Just taking evolution from this direction to fix it and passing it on in the minds of the viewers emotionally is the greatest proof that it is not scientifically dependent on something real other than lying and deception as we have said, or manipulating the concepts of adaptation and market, as if it were evidence of evolution, or playing on the strings of the god of atheistic or evolutionary knowledge gaps, just as the evolutionists made a long list more than 100 years ago of all that we did not know its function in the human body today, so they considered it remains of previous development without function. Where we see, for example, the famous cartoon series "The Flintstones" from 1960 to 1966, which is set in a comedy about the Flintstones in the Stone Age, and what concerns us here is that the repetition of such serial episodes for years on young and old is a deep and indirect instillation to accept the concept of the existence of such an already backward stoneman, although God created man (Adam) in the best calendar. The same idea was recently emulated in a high-tech film cartoon, The Croods (2013), in which the character of a slightly developed human being, influences a lower-minded family, until they take the first steps of human progress and openness to the world. It reminds me of the myth that the Neanderthals in Europe and Asia were simple, semi-human, and recently turned out to be more than 100 years old. Another cartoon, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs (2009-2013), depicts the possibility of inanimate objects (such as food and plants) turning into living beings, and even developing and reproducing, as in its sequel. Recommendations: (1) The law of Islam - Quran and Sunnah - came to recognize the need for recreation of the soul in life, but it did not make this recreation taboo, and therefore the turnout to watch anything is as permissible, and to watch a football game is better than watching what injures the soul with lusts or suspicions. (2) The need to improve the critical sense of the general Muslim population, our adolescents and our youth, when they see something of that, they are not unaware of what is intended, but each of them is a guard at the door of his eye, hearing, heart and mind, looking beyond speech and scenes of meaning and inspiration. (3) Constant community awareness of the most famous logical fallacies used by atheists to pass on their atheism or skepticism, through forums on the Internet, social networking sites, short and purposeful videos, magazines and others. Margins: According to the Center for the Study of Global Christianity, atheism was 4.7% in 1970, decreased to 2% in 2010, and is expected to reach 1.8% in 2020. http://www.gordonconwell.com/netcommunity/CSGCResources/ChristianityinitsGlobalContext.pdf (2) Gervais WM, Shariff AF, Norenzayan A., "Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice", J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Dec;101(6):1189-206. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22059841 (3) Daisy Grewal, "In Atheists We Distrust: Subjects believe that people behave better when they think that God is watching over them", Scientific American, January 17, 2012. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/in-atheists-we-distrust/ (4) Gregory Paul and Phil Zuckerman, "Why do Americans still dislike atheists?", The Washington Post, April 29, 2011. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-do-americans-still-dislike-atheists/2011/02/18/AFqgnwGF_story.html?utm_term= (5) Ole O. Olson, "Research Finds that Atheists are Most Hated and Distrusted Minority", News Junkie Post, Sep 19, 2009. http://newsjunkiepost.com/2009/09/19/research-finds-that-atheists-are-most-hated-and-distrusted-minority/ 6 See percentages in previous source. (7) Mustafa al-Akkad: Syrian-American, died and his daughter, may Allah have mercy on him 2005, in an explosion of an explosive device in a hotel in Jordan at the age of 70, and was planning to make two other international films, one about (Fatah al-Andalus), and the other about (Salah al-Din al-Ayoubi). (8) "Columbine High School Massacre: Aftershock and the Search for Reasons". Retrieved 2008–11–23. https://web.archive.org/web/20081207010454/http://www.experiencefestival.com/a/Columbine_High_School_massacre_-_Aftershock_and_the_search_for_reasons/id/1300784 9 For his story in English from Whyislam: http://www.whyislam.org/spiritual-journeys/article-on-why-islam/ Or watch her tell it herself translated from YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BeveWIXa7mM 10 Some of those who deny the existence of a certain place of memory in the brain: (Carl Lashley) Karl Lashley, a psychologist and behaviorist, who died 1985 at the age of 68, has famous experiments in separating parts of the brain of mice, and recorded not affected by memory of what he taught him, and Professor of Psychology and Psychiatry Dr. (Carl Pribram) Karl Lebram, still alive today at the age of 95, and Dr. (11) Watch this video translated from the following YouTube link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBd126ci3GA (12) Tom Head, "Conversations with Carl Sagan", University Press of Mississippi 2006, p70. (13) Today, after decades of scanning the space of the universe to look for any waves or messages or signs of sane life in which the operations of SETI Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence, competent to find any other beings to communicate! In contrast to the disregard of atheist scientists for the elaborate system, under their hands in the living cell of the Creator, and their search for any signs of a system in the broadcast wave in the universe, and such a contradiction: http://www.americanclarion.com/seti-and-scientists-who-cant-recognize-intelligent-life-19546 (14) U.S. Department of Justice - Federal Bureau of Investigation - Terrorism 2002/2005. http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005 Global Research also commented on the statistics under the title: Non-Muslims Carried Out More than 90% of All Terrorist Attacks in America http://www.globalresearch.ca/non-muslims-carried-out-more-than-90-of-all-terrorist-attacks-in-america/5333619 (15) Danios, "Europol Report: All Terrorists are Muslims…Except the 99.6% that Aren’t", January 28, 2010 in Feature, Loon Politics. http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/01/terrorism-in-europe/ (16) ORIAS Summer Institute for K–12 teachers – Absent Voices: Experience of common life in world history http://orias.berkeley.edu/summer2011/Summer2011Home.htm 17 Under the title The Future of the Global Muslim Population. http://www.pewforum.org/2011/01/27/the-future-of-the-global-muslim-population/ (18) Press releases, "Violence against Women: every day and everywhere", European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, 05/03/2014. http://fra.europa.eu/en/press-release/2014/violence-against-women-every-day-and-everywhere You can read the most prominent statistics in Arabic from the Jordanian newspaper Al-Dostor newspaper entitled: (The abuse of women in the most progressive countries), Friday, March 7, 2014. (19) Francis Hitching, "The Neck of the Giraffe: Where Darwin Went Wrong", New York: Ticknor and Fields 1982, p. 204. 20 In Al Jazeera English interview with Richard Dawkins 42 minutes. Ahmed Hassan — Source: Brahin Center website - Posted on 2014-05-03 (archived at the Internet Archive) https://braheen.com/articles/cinema-media/السينما-واللاوعي-الخطاب-الشعبي-للإلحاد