Invasive Cancer as Experimental Evidence of Evolutionary Suicide

Invasive Cancer as Empirical Evidence for Evolutionary Suicide - Dr. Ahmed Ibrahim - Issue 3 http://www.alukah.net/sharia/0/77038/ What is the theory of evolution? It is a set of hypotheses that explain the phenomenon of life, its complexity and diversity, with certain mechanisms that are assumed to be sufficient and necessary. That is to say, the existence of these mechanisms is a sufficient reason for this outcome, which is life, otherwise it could not be called an explanation. In other words, I can’t say that I explain the existence of life on Earth with carbon, oxygen, hydrogen and some other elements necessary for life. Because this mechanism, its existence does not require the existence of the result that I want to explain! * The theory may not be able to provide complete scenarios and this does not cause the fall, provided that the phenomenon remains possible with the same mechanisms, and did not fall outside the framework of the possible, if you go to a framework that is not possible with the emergence of some evidence, this is a refutation of the theory, nor an example of the survival of other parts of the phenomenon possible for the mechanisms proposed by the theory. * Apart from the fact that evolution requires many things from its hypotheses, did not materialize, but it is called the survival of what is proven against it, such as the irreducible complexity and poverty of the fossil record of the middle rings, and the absence of a fixed phylogenetic tree tells a direct relationship between the species, but we will come down with the opponent and consider that all the introduction is correct, and think in a Darwinian way where we believe that the origin of all this complexity and diversity that we see are mutations. Mutations are always new, and this new is either an increase in validity or a decrease in it, and natural selection is always with qualities and strategies that increase validity. * What the research did, is that he used the same mechanisms against evolution, research is not in the negation of the existence of mutations or natural selection and does not argue in the deep times - assumed by Darwin - but used to destroy the theory, now mutations and natural selection and deep time of millions of years are those who stand to build a big dilemma against the theory of evolution has no solution that can be attributed to a physical mechanism at all. Let’s wear Darwinian glasses to see things in their three dimensions; mutations, natural selection and deep time, and look at the phenomenon of life and focus on the units that make up this phenomenon. Biological societies Population, this is the right unit of the biological system, not the individual or the species. * Because looking at the individual or the species overlooks a very important aspect of the phenomenon of life, namely the ecological interactions, such as the interaction of the individual with the rest of his group and the impact of this on that and vice versa, and the interaction of the individual with other species, whether he is a prey or a hunter, or was an intruder or host or other many environmental interactions, and added to that physical conditions and the extent of the impact of society, all this can enter into the scene only by studying the biological community. * This is what the researchers in the field of Adaptive dynamics, and the development of mathematical models to monitor the prospects of invasion mutation relatively large validity of a community has its own strategies and the results of this how it will be, the existence of such a mutation with higher validity and better strategy will cause a disruption in this community, and will affect it can only be followed through environmental interaction, which may lead to a complete change in the form of society, and even become a completely new place of the old. But much more important is the evolutionary suicide, which occurs when this new invasive mutation destroys food sources or destroys any essential condition of the life of this society, whether biological or physical, or the existence of the invasive mutation leads to the destruction of the source of food that competes with society, and then the source is left behind, but the increase in competition leads to the destruction of society, including the gaseous also. What can be expected if we look at the Darwinian three-dimensional glasses – mutations, selection and long time – to the basic unit of the biological system, population, we could not see it!, and we could not give a Darwinian explanation of this phenomenon or this building block and basic unit of the phenomenon!, No doubt this means the end of the theory as a hypothesis to explain life. This has already been proven by research, and we will explain how this happened. We agreed that “society” is the basic unit of the biological system that exists on Earth, and that we want to explain its existence now, and that it may mean a society of cells, it does not have to be a group of independent beings. We are in front of a phenomenon, which is every society that already exists, and this existence itself is proof that this society has not been exposed to a single gaseous mutation that causes evolutionary suicide, because if it had happened, this society would not now! So every population society is evidence of no evolutionary suicide. This is the phenomenon, and this is its constant necessity; whoever wants to give an explanation for life must have a mechanism to prevent evolutionary suicide. Now we wear Darwinian glasses to look at a mechanism possessed by the theory of evolution that can prevent the occurrence of evolutionary suicide. 1. Mutations Can we say that mutations prevented the existence of this invasive mutant that would later cause the evolutionary suicide of the society in which it would appear? Answer: Absolutely not. Because mutations are a completely random, uncontrolled process, and in the presence of this gaseous mutant there is no genetic barrier, mutations cannot prevent something that is genetically possible, so they do not have this mechanism of inhibiting evolutionary suicide. Natural selection This time natural selection strongly supports the existence of this invasive mutant, which will cause evolutionary suicide if it comes, because it is higher than others, and has better survival strategies than others, and for the first time natural selection turns a mechanism against the theory of evolution, which has long been relied upon as a magic key to every closed door, it is if it does not have that mechanism inhibiting evolutionary suicide as well. 3- Deep time Millions of years have always been presented as another magic key that limits the fluid from the complexity or dazzling functions found in living organisms, but unfortunately this time also gives his back to Darwinism and turns as a factor against it, the longer the chance of the emergence of an invasive mutation that will cause evolutionary suicide, according to mathematical models that deal with random possibilities such as mutations, he also does not have this inhibitory mechanism. So there's nothing wrong with the evolutionary theory of suicide! There is therefore no mechanism preventing it through the theory of evolution, there is no explanation for the existence of any population we want to explain its existence, and there is no explanation that the theory of evolution can provide for life. All of this is unmistakable, but one problem was the lack of empirical evidence to prove these mathematically proven results, because evolutionary suicide was seen only in a narrow environmental range. And by the way, all of this research is not for creationists or proponents of "intelligent design," but for biologists, mathematicians, and environmentalists led by mathematical models to these findings, most of whom are aware of or avoid attacking the theory of evolution. The role of the research was to provide a practical model for evolutionary suicide, provided that this model has very many environmental interactions and comprehensive to prove the occurrence of evolutionary suicide in all these environmental conditions with a practical model, in addition that this model is the only embodiment and the only practical model of the Darwinian scenario of the evolution of life on earth, i.e. it has terrible features in the application of evolutionary suicide in a practical and comprehensive manner. This was in two parts: Section I: Proving that cancer results from the same mechanisms of evolutionary theory as mutations and natural selection, and this is an independent research area in which there is a lot of research. The second was to prove that it was a case of evolutionary suicide because it was an invasive mutation, destroying the resources that compete with others, leading to the death of the whole society, including cancer, by the death of the patient, and this is also an independent research area supported by many research. What I did was assemble the basal pieces to make the picture clear, showing the result, which is not in the interest of the theory of evolution. Evolutionary suicide is the same as what in economics is called the tragedy of the commons, and it is actually a biological application of it and there is research that has mentioned this, as Game Theory is originally an economic but is now the main pillar in the calculations of the theory of evolution, as well as the tragedy of shared resources. It is the destruction of the source on which investors compete as a result of the power of one or some investors to profit in a way that harms the market itself and the resources themselves, leading to the collapse of resources and the loss of all, including those who over-exploitation behaviors, this is a loss and collapse of everyone as a result of excessive force of one and not the result of weakness. Note that the problem now is that there is a mechanism that prevents evolutionary suicide, which is an application of the tragedy of the commons, if there was a solution to prevent the tragedy of the commons, it would itself be a solution to evolutionary suicide, and there was a mechanism to prevent the occurrence of evolutionary suicide! Is there a mechanism that can prevent the tragedy of the commons and solve the problem? Yes, all the studies that have been done on the tragedy of shared resources have shown that the solution lies in the existence of governments that impose sanctions and regulate the exploitation of resources, or in negotiations, or in the presence of moral or religious obstacles. This can be summed up as intelligent intervention, which is the only mechanism that can solve this dilemma. Thus, the only mechanism that can prevent evolutionary suicide, as well as explain life, is a wise designer. The research was published in Network Biology, a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Impact factor Magazine for 2013 is 1.0895 Link to topic: http://www.alukah.net/sharia/0/77038/#ixzz3G2WrKTEB — Source: Published on Facebook's "Braheen Center" page