There is a god: Anthony Flo and the dialectic of the text and the person - Introduction

There is a God: How does the world’s fiercest atheist change his thoughts? Written by: Anthony Flew Translated by Jannat Jamal Submitted by: Dr. Mohammed Al-Awadhi Edition: 1st 2016 Number of Pages: 256 Size: 17*24 cm Anthony Flew... and the script and the character argument. How strong is the force of the opposability of an intellectual symbol to his old convictions, and his retreat from the concepts of the cost of his life in preaching them, and his full awareness of the reversal of the mental foundations of his previous cognitive construction? In which order of logical arguments we put this intellectual transformation? Are we in front of a demonstrative argument or dialectic or rhetorical or sentimental or (Sophistic) according to the division of the region? We start the export of the book (There is a God) with these questions for several considerations, firstly the position of the personality that we are about to talk about Anthony Flew, and secondly, the result of his declared new convictions of media hype interested in the reactions of the camp "believers" and "atheists", and the voice of emotion among the activists of both groups has manifested the duality of "exaggeration" of believers and "exaggeration" of atheists of the same event, to reveal the prejudicial bias among individuals. It is a renewed issue whenever an effective symbol announces his retreat or rebellion against his conviction and his intellectual heritage of faith, material or historical. An example of this in our Arab world is the name of Abdullah Al Qasimi, who celebrates the atheistic violent response to monotheism, which shipped his books critical of God and religion. In contrast, the believers celebrated the return of Dr. Mustafa Mahmoud to faith after his many atheistic designs, and what he did to support religion in his famous program of science and faith. How will both opposing camps receive the end result of Steve Jobs’s conviction in the God with which Walter Isaacson concluded his book on the life of Jobs, which reads: “The probability of believing in God for me is fifty fifty.” After these questions, I briefly comment on the imbalance of thinking and expression in dealing with this attraction through dialectic (text and person) in the form of points: While atheists lament that they have taken Anthony Flew’s return from atheism as a formidable argument, they have exercised the same logic in reverse, chief among them Richard Dawkins. Instead of discussing Flew’s evidence, he jumped to the understatement of the individual, citing his return to atheism as an adult and his attempt to bring the spotlight to the media. Some have objected to Anthony Flew as a philologist, so how does he involve himself in discussing the evidence of biologists, astronomers, and physicists in his book? The answer is not to object to the details of their pure science, but to the erroneous philosophical conclusions based on it. Intellectuals of all stripes cite scientific theories, such as Newton’s laws of motion, Einstein’s general and special relativity, the Heisenberg Doctrine, and many others. The biased researcher folds his opponent's evidence (text), or surrounds it with a veil of ambiguity or total disregard; focusing on (the person). While serious and objective in reading the ideas of their opponents, they acknowledge the validity and strength, and after discussing them determine their position. This is what Anthony Flew did, and what distinguishes him, and here is the relevance of his character. We are not only a regressive thinker, but with a sincere will to seek the truth, and a constant effort to review and prosecute concepts. Investing the responses of opponents; one of the features of this thinker is that he reads the responses of critics of the idea of reading who is looking for weaknesses in his evidence, and then corrects his mistake. This is what developed his vision, unlike his fellow atheists. * Flo did not only refer to scientific references in his research, but also contacted specialists, including Gerald Schroeder and John Halden, to examine his theses, as stated in his televised testimony and confirmed in his book. One of the tasks of the influencers in his intellectual reviews, he stated in his book that scientific discoveries made him an atheist embarrassed of his atheism. Compared to others, science leads them to adopt superstition biased by their intellectual inertia, and perhaps Richard Dawkins is a clear model for anyone who listened to his answer to the question of the emergence of life. Where the evidence leads you, follow it; it is this which Flew took as a slogan in his life and his search for truth, which elevated his concepts and made him judge his convictions; questions of existential beginnings, the problem of evils and pains in the universe, his view of science, and the attitude of the mind from the cognitive component of existence. * It is neither true nor appropriate for different scholars on a particular fact, to be drawn in their dialogues to the symbolism of the duality (hypothetism) and (hypothetism), as much dealt with the news of Anthony Flew's intellectual transformation. (The text) is presented to (the person), but the (text) cannot be separated from its source, because of its relevance of dimensions cast its shadow. To confirm the correctness of our opinion and the invalidity of the opponent's opinion... The answer in the text that you have in your hands is a book (there is a God). Dr. Mohammed Al-Awadhi A sample of the book to buy an electronic copy Clips attached to the article: http://braheen.com/download/TIG-public.pdf - Anthony Flew. — Source: Brahin Center website - Published on 2019-12-09 (archived at the Internet Archive) http://braheen.com/center-publications/26-intros/97-tig-ar-intro