Comments on Dr. Muhammad Qasim’s Tweets About Kenneth Miller and Intelligent Design

Comments on Dr. Muhammad Qasim’s Tweets About Kenneth Miller and Intelligent Design Dr. Mohammad Qassim, like others, raised an issue that is not new, which is the dispute over the theory of evolution and intelligent design, and I will not dwell too much on commenting on the horrors he mentioned, which said in the end that Miller managed to demolish the arguments of intelligent design and falsify them and that they settled in the basket of false science, but my answer will be as much as the proposal he put forward. It is methodologically wrong that Qas personally waiting for me to protest the intelligent design. First, everything that Mohammed Qasim said is based on a number of fallacies that many took before him and are still followed by some promoters of the theory of Darwinian evolution, so the focus will be on: (c) Some of these errors. (2) Indication of followers and those interested in sources of expansion in criticism of what is based on them. In his tweets, Dr. Mohammed says: * Muhammad’s claims here are based on a fallacy that includes the recognition that everyone outside the official scientific institution of evolution is neither experts nor scientists whose criticism and opinion can be considered. We must be well aware from the beginning and always that the decision on this issue is not the task of natural science, but the philosophy of science and the sociology of science. Michael J. Denton, for example, is one of the leading biological experts and has well-regarded scientific articles, yet he is considered by the evolutionary public to be an enemy of the theory for his endorsement of intelligent design, and we will talk about it shortly. Hence, Mohammed did not mention – quite rightly not, of course – that Miller was answered by equally important biological experts, including Michael Denton, Michael Behe, and others. Muhammad did not mention that Miller himself was a controversial figure among the evolutionists themselves, and that he was not fully accepted into the scientific establishment, due to his scientific hypocrisy, in the eyes of some, for religion and vice versa. Mohammed claimed that intelligent design is a hypothesis, and he did not state that Darwinian evolution is a hypothesis for the same reasons – to admit the decline of their pilgrims – as it has not been proved experimentally that the work of natural selection on random mutations – as says the prestigious evolutionary Lynn Margolis in her book Acquire Genomes – is suitable for the production of new species. And all this is to come down with all the factors affecting the conflict between evolutionists and intelligent design. * Of course, it is no secret that all this is based on the fallacy of invoking the report just for the report argument by assertion and we will treat it the same or increase it when needed. Yes Miller is a well-known evolutionary figure, then what? Yes Miller is a Catholic Christian whipped, then what? Yes Miller appeared as a prime witness against intelligent design, then what? Yes Miller sees intelligent design as a pseudoscience, then what? Does the intelligent design thesis become a pseudoscience just because he sees it as a pseudoscience? We have not yet made a counter-comment to Muhammad’s preference. So far these are just pauses with the language he uses to promote the theory. Now to the counter-comment, I say: Muhammad did not mention that in the experts qualified to rule in this dispute he supported intelligent design and saw it supported by strong evidence, such as the scientist Dean H. Kenyon himself called for the adoption of this thesis and suggested that the book The Design of Life be a course in formal education. * From the experts – undoubtedly the outcasts of the evolutionary scientific establishment! – who wrote in the defense of intelligent design and presented their evidence of the mutational incapacity of natural selection to produce the amazing complexity of living things Michael Behe, Jonathan Wells, William Dembski, and Stephen C. Meyer, Brahein’s center has translated this trend. * The first case is the evolutionary scientific institution and the film (Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed) summarized the story of the ideological and political persecution of those who violate the trend of neo-evolutionary law (this link translated). As I mentioned earlier, I do not want the cuff to swing to the side without a good reason for the audience of readers and followers, and I want the fact of the dispute in this case to provide a full (Muslim) reader to judge it by what clears him before God alone. So I will limit the reader and follower to the position of the other party and the most prominent arguments, so that his mind works without prejudice or presupposition -as much as possible! * Mohammed claims that the lecture provides a strong scientific refutation of intelligent design, and it is time for the reader to indicate the work of progress is in turn a strong scientific refutation of the theory of Darwinian evolution and evidence is no less powerful - at worst - for the thesis of intelligent design. Let’s start with an article summarizing the monetary responses to Kenneth Miller, which is on this link. Since Dr. Mohamed raised the issue of the trial and Miller's testimony, it is appropriate to tell the reader: Retrial: The Hidden Story of the Dover Case, a translation by the Braheen Center, makes the reader aware of the reality of such disputes over issues of science when they become social rather than purely scientific. Article (retrial) of the director of the biological department at the center of Mr. Ahmed Yahya, at this link from the site of Brahin. The importance of mentioning this book for the blind confidence that some put in the scientific institutions and what is going on in them, so that we hear a famous and famous phrase is "I believe in science!"; This book is enough to make you believe the evidence instead of science (the book from the translation of the center of evidence). Now to a set of central materials in the protest of intelligent design and the critique of modern Darwinian evolutionary theory: Dempsey & Wells (Life Design), a book full of cash and detailed evidence. (For an overview of the status of Darwinian evolution in my view, my introduction to this book can be found here). Darwin's Scepticism, by the philosopher of science, Dr. Stephen Mayer, is one of the most recent and comprehensive studies in favor of intelligent design, praised by one of the most important experts in the life sciences, Dr. Wolf Ekkehard L nig (chief biologist at the Max Planck Institute), who said of Mayer's work: "The book of Darwin's scepticism to this moment is the most recent, accurate and comprehensive review of all the relevant evidence." The book (Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth?) by Professor of Cellular Biology Dr. Jonathan Wells - translation of the Brahin Center, which contains a detailed critique of the basic icons and themes that underpin and promote the official Darwinian evolutionary discourse. 4 Darwin's Black Box by Professor of Biochemistry Dr. Michael Behe – translation of the Brahing Center, and its author is self-identifying. Behe has stated what he means by intelligent design when he uses it in an article titled (What exactly is intelligent design?), published by the journal (Biology and Philosophy) in 2001, in which he says: Intelligent design may mean that the laws of nature itself are designed to produce life and the complex systems that support it. Is there any other reason to conclude, by taking the laws of nature as they are, that life and its constituent systems were intentionally arranged, and there are other reasons than the laws of nature to conclude that a mousetrap was designed? Handbook (Science and Human Origin) - translation of the Brahin Center, which is short of what was written in the challenge of the uniqueness of the human species to the mechanisms of Darwinian development. The Handbook of Speciation Translation of the Brahmin Center is one of the most important pieces of criticism of the speciation hypothesis specifically to critique the most famous of Darwinists which forms the cornerstone of modern Darwinian theory of evolution. 7 – Book (Science and design guide in the universe) – translation of the Takween Center, one of the important books that sought to provide scientific and mathematical evidence for the benefit of intelligent design. 8- The Fate of Nature: The Laws of Life Reveal the Existence of Purpose in the Universe, by Dr. Michael Denton, the first and most important biological expert to write a critique of Darwinian evolution. 9 and 10 Michael Denton's two most important books are Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, which, though advanced, is the most important in his critique of Darwinian evolution, and the other is a very recent book, a continuation of the course of criticism that he began with the first book, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis. For visual materials related to intelligent design and its issues, there is a set of visual materials translated by the Center for Evidence and can be found in its official YouTube channel here. Perhaps the most important of these are (Darwin's Dilemma: The Mystery of Cambrian Fossils) and (Information Puzzle: The Cambrian Information Explosion). This is a short clip by Dean Canyon, a leading proponent of Darwinian evolution, in which he acknowledges the importance of recent scientific advances that have left no room for Darwinian evolutionary mechanisms, as in the past, to explain this degree of complexity in living organisms (click here to view). Enough, and I leave the responsibility of research and judgment to the readers and followers... even after a while. God loves me and all my brothers and sisters, and I am thankful to the Lord. Written by Abdullah bin Saeed Al Shehri Friday 13th of Sha'ban 1437 AH .. We have received Allah and you from us from the holy month of Ramadan, Amen. Clips attached to the article: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFXMx3HksUU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bD8rNGvxS-Q https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfkmDEXnHg0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMttyk2agEk Abdullah Al - Shehri — Source: Brahin Center website - Published on 2020-02-18 (archived at the Internet Archive) http://www.braheen.com:80/kitzmiller-vs-id