Texts are translated automatically from Arabic. Original files and media retain their original language.

Scientific Miracles

Clear Foundational Truths: The Believer’s Steadfastness and the Atheist’s Confusion

13 min read

Arbitrators between the stability of the believer and the confusion of the atheist reflect the view that we see the universe and man on the existential decision related to religion and atheism, and both the believer and the atheist proceed from a set of theses to prove the validity of his evidence and the validity of what he believes...

Clear Foundational Truths: The Believer’s Steadfastness and the Atheist’s Confusion Tribunals Between the firmness of the believer and the confusion of the atheist. The view that we see the universe and man is reflected in the existential decision related to religion and atheism, and both the believer and the atheist proceed from a set of theses to prove the validity of his evidence and the validity of what he believes using all descriptive and analytical tools and others, in order to reach a sound result in his decisions and judgments and philosophy of life. For the importance of the concept of courts in the construction of both aspects, I will present in this article an attempt to show the explanatory ability of both religion and atheism to the concept of courts and constants, and to imply the concept of similarity until the picture is complete. Dr. Hatim Al-Aouni defines courts as: "Every firm with certain proofs will be the capital of the thought of deviation for the intensity of its mastery and the strength of its intellectual construction, and the defect in it will be the cause of the imbalance in thinking." Grounds for definition: 1. Truth (i.e., the concept of truth) constitutes the most important axis and starting point in the lives of human beings, because without a certain system knowledge will not equal, and will not establish ethics, and will not know the correct of the sick. 2. The counter-statement of certainty, which is the lack of it or the so-called relativity of truth is a statement that enters its owner in a deep problem, as it is a contradictory statement itself; if we ask you to say (everything relative) This statement in brackets is certain or relative? If they say: Certainty they have contradicted their doctrine because they do not recognize certainty in the first place, and if they say: Relativity they have invalidated their own statement. 3. "Excessive relativity leads to nihilism, with the consequent loss of the virtue of certainty and the status of charity, and drowning in uncertainty, confusion and decisiveness." (2) That is why certainty and truth are the masters of the situation, and the starting point for healthy humans. "The Fine Tuning Universe" There is a set of cosmological constants that govern the functioning of the universe, and if it is disturbed by a very small amount, the universe becomes unfit for life and understanding, and in this regard Einstein says his famous saying: “The most incomprehensible thing in the universe is that it is comprehensible.” The most incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is comprehensible (3) 1. Biologist Michael Denton says: "For example, if the gravitational force is a trillion times stronger, the universe will be very small and its current life-history will be very short! For an average star whose mass is a trillion times less than that of the sun! On the other hand, if gravity is less energetic, there will be no stars or galaxies at all, and so other relations and values are no less finite. It is clear that if these different forces and their constants do not have the exact values they have taken, there will be no stars, no supernovae, no planets, no atoms, no life. According to Professor Gerard F Gilmore: "It is black energy that brings our universe together, and without that amount of black energy, the sun would move away from our galaxy, and there would be no life." The Creator of the Universe: Carl Zimmer, the author of the study, wrote on the National Geographic website: "It is difficult to estimate the number of cells in the human body, because of the death of a very large number of cells every second, in addition to the varying sizes of humans, and it can be approximated that in the human body weighing 70 kilograms there are 70 trillion cells" (6) In the Qur’an, Dr. Abu Sa’id says, “Do you not see the heart? "The main arteries and veins have many branches so that they can reach all cells of the body, which is similar to the network of water distribution in cities using pipes or pipes that start with large pipes, which may be more than a meter in diameter, and end with pipes half an inch in diameter at homes. The average total lengths of blood vessels in the human body is 97,000 kilometers! For comparison with water systems, the total length of pipes in the Cairo water system, for example, is 20,000 kilometers, providing water for 15 million people. Look at the precision and miraculousness between arteries and cells and these great numbers and how well connected to them, and for this is one of the great courts to preserve human life and the continuation of its system. And look at this cosmic precision that keeps the universe from being destroyed, in the equations of (controlling) the universe, where if you have a very simple disorder, the system of the universe is completely dysfunctional, and becomes unviable. The Atheist's View of the Universe and Man: In the eyes of the atheist, looking for gaps in the cosmic system (corruption, randomness in it), and like in the human body, evolutionary Jay Stephen Gould says: "The theory of natural selection would not have replaced the doctrine of divine creation if there had been a brilliantly clear design that would have enshrouded all beings. Charles Darwin understood this and focused on the features that would exist in a world founded on wisdom. This principle is still true today" (8) They talk a lot about archeological and atrophied members, and about the universe, a lot of talk about (why this whole universe is so big to serve this man and harness everything to him, and it is a point of neglect that has no value in the universe?!.. To the last of these similarities that the atheist is driving. The greatest problem with the atheist is that he believes that the believer does not admit corruption in terms of origin, and this is a mistake and a flaw in the scrutiny of the point of view of faith. Where the view of faith starts from the door of the arbitrator: It is the accurate system in the universe as some of its indications in the beginning of the article, and what is similar from the cosmic system or human creation, the view of the believer returns to the arbitrator, and until the mind and mind are upright, otherwise the abnormal would be the rule and the judgment of reason never! The image of the believer consists of a shadow and an origin, and any view of one of them in isolation from the other results in a defect in perception, we see the blackness in the image as a creative factor to complete its shadow and beauty, and we return it to that sun and seas that adorn the view, and this is a basis on which the origin of thought and the strength of logic and does not deny. In the Qur’an, Dr. Abu Bakr says, “And of all things we have created a couple so that you may remember.” "The fact that God's mushrooms of the universe are mating is further evidence of the contrast between the creature and the singular Creator in himself and his qualities and actions, since what is always ingrained in human experience that creation is one, and subject to one laws, and governed by one movement, growth and collapse, all this indicates the unity of the Creator (His praise) who created all that impotent organization." The believer does not deny his ignorance of some aspects of the universe that have not yet manifested their wisdom to him, but rather he integrates them into the cosmic arbitrator represented by accuracy until the beauty of the image that robbed the minds of scientists and writers. The Arbitrator and Critic of Sam Harris's Thesis in Divine Wisdom: Sam Harris begins by mentioning the number of children who die before the age of five, and says that they are in the millions, and then weaves on this saying arguments (emotional) in the injustice of God and how to leave them to die? Let's start with a simple calculation that I made on 30/3/2014 at 10.40 minutes for the number of births and deaths in the world based on the site http://www.worldometers.info The calculation was as follows: No. of Births *100/33686607 / 70000000000 *0.48% Number of deaths * 100 / 13899903 > 0.19% A simple calculation instructs you that the arbiter here is a blessing of life, where it is worth almost three times the death rate! The question then arises: why does the atheist not look at this fixed ratio and what follows from it: joy and grace and creation and order and order, and leaves himself to the same thing that does not know his wisdom! As Dr. Haitham Talaat asked in an article: How does the atheist explain the dilemma of good in the earth, which is the origin and basis? Look around you (most of them): Is the origin of health or disease There is no doubt that health is the origin and life is the origin, so why this view of the atheist as if he wants to say that the origin is disease and death? But as for those in whose hearts is Zig, they follow the likes of it, seeking sedition and seeking its interpretation; and none knows its interpretation except Allah, and those who are steadfast in knowledge say: We believe in it, everyone is from our Lord, and none is mentioned except those who are at the gates. Harris neglects a very important issue in existential research, namely (the arbitrator of wisdom and mastery), a person of great mastery and intellectual construction, as I pointed out by definition, will make the death of children for wisdom and knowledge: not for tampering and helplessness! Let's make the case more clearly: let's talk about the cosmic balance in the shadow of a famous event in Arizona, where in 1907 there were 4,000 deer in peace, and according to the natural balance set by God, the American authorities allowed the hunters to hunt the predators of those deer in that area! How many cougars and wolves? They thought they would be more merciful than God in those deer! After the hunters stopped hunting cougars and wolves: the number of deer returned to near the previous number 4000, where the last stock in 1939 reached 10,000 deer, and this was in accordance with the natural balance imposed by God, and according to his wisdom! (11) How could the atheist have missed that the death of children or any soul on earth is in vain, and why did he not return it to the origin of wisdom in the universe, which is here the delicate balance of wonder in the system of the universe, especially that the cause of measurement is clear in the measurement of deer on children. The death of a child will be followed by a test for them in the Hereafter, as stated in the Qur'an (12), and like all those who have not been informed of the messages of Allah in this world, it will be a test for others. At the end of Harris's thesis: What does atheism offer to the parents of those who die from children, and what does it offer to these children, based on what it decides that nature is coercive? Because when you say what is the fault of a person to grow up in an environment that does not believe in the right religion - and this leads to saying that the environment has a direct impact on humans - why do you object to doing it with murder? In fact, it is nothing but nothing. Arbitrator: “The heavens and the earth will be filled with truth as you speak.” A lot of people say in the explanation: By the power of the Holy Spirit, you will not be able to make any promises, nor will you be able to make any promises. Pronunciation is this phenomenon that is undisputed among the wise people of the earth, and it is one of the wisest qualities among human beings, and distinguish them from animals! However, the issue of pronunciation and language is one of the most difficult at the level of interpretation and essence, it is a miracle and a sign of God, and explains Karl Popper language based on the interpretation of his professor (Karl Bjhler) based on three functions: Expressive Function: An external expression of an internal state, and these even radios or traffic lights can emit simple expressions, animals as well as humans, and even any action you do is a form of self-expression. Signal or diffusion function: When our self-expression (whether linguistic or otherwise) triggers a reaction in an animal or a human: we can say that it has taken the signal outlet. Descriptive Function: It includes the two types above, but what distinguishes this function as well as expression and communication (which may become aspects of the situation that are not important at all) it makes statements that can be true or false: any interference of the criterion of truth and falsehood. Popper added to them the argumentative function: to add the argument to the three functions while introducing its two values: wrong and right. And so, the materialist or the physicist is in Popper's opinion: he can only deal with the first and the second function, since the physicist will make it an interview with the speaker's state of expression only, and the behavioralist will consider it part of communication and reaction only! And what follows from saying these disastrous (as Popper himself calls it) is that this opinion "ignores all that is characteristic of human language and separates it from animal language: namely, its ability to produce truthful and false arguments." Popper referred to Noam Chomsky's theory of language "which he speaks of as a miracle, as a phenomenon that cannot be explained physically, but within a generative model that assumes the latency of language ability in a child's mind. This latency means that the mind is not just the brain or a set of cells and enzymes."[14] Look at this clear hidden witness, the date and the resurrection are clear things, but they are hidden like him in terms of interpretation and essence. Is it permissible for us to invoke silence which is (similar) to the arbitrator who is the pronunciation, and then say pronunciation is a process that is not important because there are those who do not speak, and therefore there is no benefit from this process and then God has no wisdom in it and then God does not exist? And finally: After this analysis, which is better to explain the arbitrator and the like, faith or atheism? References: (1) Sharif Hatem Al-Aouni, The Courts of the Nation's Security Valve and the Basis of Persistence, General Directorate of Information and Culture, Department of Culture and Publishing, Call of Right series book 1432 AH. (2) The outcome of civil discourse, Ibrahim bin Omar Al-Sakran, Center for Contemporary Thought 1435 AH. (3) Antonina Vallentin «Einstein: A Biography (1954)»، p 24. He quoted from Einstein's original quote: (the eternal mystery of the world is its comprehensibility) - "Physics and Reality" in Journal of the Franklin Institute (March 1936). (4) Michael Denton، «Nature's Destiny :Hom the laws of Biology Purpose in the universe»، The New York The free press .1998. p.12-13. 5 In an article on Voice of America (Scientists plan to make 3-d map of the milky way) (6) Phenomena: The Loom - Nationalgeographic.com phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/10/23/how-many-cells-are-in-your-body Encyclopedia of Scientific Miracles in the Quran and Sunnah (7): “And within yourselves—will you not see?” The heart http://quran-m.com/container2.php?fun=artview&id=803 (8) Ever since Darwin – Jay Stephen Gould – P.91 (9) Article titled verse on the benefits hunting site: http://www.saaid.net/Doat/bakkar/021.htm (10) The dilemma of goodness - Dr. Haitham Talaat - Atheism in the balance http://www.laelhad.com/index.php?p=2-0-247 (11) The Lesson of the Kaibab - Biologycorner.com. http://www.biologycorner.com/worksheets/kaibab.html (12) The talks of the test of the people of the period in the weddings of the day of the resurrection, such as the talk by Qasim bin Ibagh, al-Bazar and Abu Ya'al and Ibn 'Abd al-Barr in the preface: "The day of the resurrection will come with four: the child and the fool and whoever dies in the period and the old pyramid mortal, all speak his argument. " 13 Karl Popper, John Eckles, "The Self and Her Brain," translated by Dr. Adel Mustafa. (14) Dr. Abdul Wahab Al-Masiri, “Physics of Materialism and the Dismantling of Man,” Dar Al-Fikr, p. Ammar Suleiman — Source: Brahin Center website - Published 2020-03-30 (archived at the Internet Archive) http://braheen.com:80/mag/2nd/52-mohkmat-b-m-a

Comments

There are no published comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Add your comment

Comments are reviewed before publication.

Visitor Statistics

Loading statistics…

Today’s visitors

—

Online now

—

Today follows Morocco’s time zone. Online now means visitors active within the last two minutes. Counts are approximate; each browser is counted once per day.

Where are our readers visiting from?

Loading visitors by country…

Countries are estimated. We do not display visitors’ IP addresses or precise locations.