We said about yesterday that it is a very happy day for opponents of evolution around the world! Since then, objections and questions are repeated, why? The Nobel Prize in Medicine, as Alfred Nobel himself said, should be given to “who has made the most important discovery in the field of medicine or physiology...
Opposition to evolution forces the Nobel Committee to declare its support for evolution.
We said about yesterday that it was a very happy day for opponents of evolution around the world!
And from then on, objections and questions recur, why?
The Nobel Prize in Medicine, as Alfred Nobel himself said, must be given to “the one who has made the most important discovery in the field of medicine or physiology.”
And let's put a lot of lines under the word domain, it's the password in this story.
Was D. Babu's work in medicine or physiology?
To understand more about what kind of discoveries the Nobel Prize is awarded to, let’s read the reasons why the prize has been awarded since the beginning of this century:
2000 "for their discoveries concerning signal transduction in the nervous system"
2001 "for their discoveries the main regulators of the cell cycle"
2002 "for their discoveries concerning the genetic regulation of organ growth and programmed cell death"
2003 "for their discoveries concerning magnetic resonance imaging"
2004 "for their discoveries concerning odor receptors and the regulation of the olfactory system"
2005 "For the discovery of Helicobacter pylori bacteria and their role in stomach disease and peptic ulcer disease"
2006 "for their discovery of RNA interference - gene silencing by double-stranded RNA"
2007 "for their discoveries concerning the principles of introducing certain genetic modifications in mice by the use of embryonic stem cells"
2008 "for his discovery of human papillomaviruses causing cervical cancer"
"for their discovery of HIV."
2009 "for the discovery of how the chromosome is protected by telomere and telomerase enzyme"
2010 "for his development of in vitro fertilization"
2011 "On their discoveries about natural immune activation"
"On his studies of stem cell and its role in adaptive immunity"
2012 "To discover mature cells that can be translated into catalytic cells"
2013 "for their robotic discoveries regulating the passage of the vesicle, a major transport system in our cells"
2014 "for their discovery of cells that allow the brain to stand in space"
2015 "for their discoveries concerning a new treatment for infections caused by worm parasites"
"for their discoveries concerning a new treatment for malaria."
2016 "For his discoveries of the mechanisms of autophagy"
2017 "for their discovery of molecular mechanisms that control the biological clock of man"
2018 "For their role in the discovery of a cancer treatment using the immune system"
2019 "for their discoveries about how cells sense oxygen availability and adapt to it"
2020 "For their role in the detection of hepatitis C virus"
2021 "To discover temperature and touch receptors"
None of these discoveries are based on historical discovery.
This has been going on for over 120 years!
For the first time in its history since the award began, it is given to a discovery related to past historical events!
Can you imagine with us the magnitude of this momentous event that we are facing?
So what did Dr. Babu offer to be placed on this list?
At the outset, it should be stressed that we fully respect the enormous scientific effort made by Dr. Babu and his team, Dr. Babu, and all those in the scientific field, for their enormous efforts in enriching human knowledge, but only our opposition to the great efforts made in advocating a certain erroneous ideology, whether Darwinian evolution or otherwise.
It should also be made clear that Dr. Babu's research on Neanderthals and Denisova is not contested from our point of view between pro- and anti-evolutionists. According to Dr. Sigrid Shearer (formerly of the University of Munich's Anthropological Institute), differences between human-like species belonging to the genus Homo can be explained by the small evolutionary influences of microevolutionary variations of size, climatic pressures and genetic drift.
The development proved by Dr. Babu's research is not the kind of development that provokes disagreement between supporters and opponents of Darwinism in the first place! This kind of development, evidenced by many evidences from various fields, the objection comes only when the supporters of development and its fanatics try to generalize the correct evidence observed to the higher classification categories (family, rank, sect, division, etc.) without the slightest evidence!
But this is not our case now, our case is, why did this year's Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology get derailed and given to a discovery that adds to our knowledge historically?
Has the prize suddenly become the history of medicine and the history of physiology?
What is the strong motivation for the award to remember “evolution” for the first time in its history?
According to the advanced statement published by the Nobel Committee, what Dr. Babu and his team did was a discovery of essentially historical proportions! But it has to do with human physiology, explained in the statement under the title (Relevance for human physiology), what is this relationship?
In the first line of this paragraph, the committee says: "Savante Babu's work offers exciting possibilities," which is another deviation from the course of the award, after the award was given to proven discoveries in the field, for the first time given to historically confirmed discoveries with functionally exciting possibilities!!
“The sequences introduced – in the gene flow events between our species genome and the Neanderthal and Denisovan species – that have been positively selected are likely to provide functional information about our genome.”
Once again, the Nobel Prize does not shy away from showing us that it really understands that a remarkable contribution to our genetic history does not mean that it is likewise a definite contribution to physiology!
We continue with the passages to read about examples of these sequences of insertions: the gene version of the Denisovan-derived hypoxia pathway EPAS1, which provides a survival advantage when living at high altitudes, is already present in present-day Tibetans.
Again, useful, important, good, fascinating historical information, but not the kind of information for which Nobel is given in medicine and physiology!
Had the Nobel Prize been awarded for each discovery, the budget of Sweden and Norway would have expired and not all the prizes would have been awarded.
Another great example illustrated by Dr. Babu's work is for a set of TLRs-like genes, TLR6-TLR1-TLR10, which are co-recognition receptors for microbes and interferences in allergic reactions.
This great historical information, would not have been discovered had it not been for the research of Dr. Babu, it is never underestimated by anyone who appreciates scientific knowledge, but again we ask, has the prize become in the history of physiology and medical history?!
Since, of course, the answer is no, will every discovery similar to a set of immune receptors receive the same recognition and be awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine and Physiology?
And since the obvious answer is no too, why then would the prize be awarded to Dr. Babu!
We’re still looking at why, and going into the hottest region in the report, which has occupied humanity since the beginning of this decade, recent studies by Babu and Zipraj have shown that older alleles on chromosomes 3 and 12, which include the compound oligadenylase (OAS), can affect the likelihood of respiratory failure during S-A-R-S-C-o-V-2 infection.
All the huge efforts that have been made to contribute to the understanding and treatment of this virus have been ignored, and this modest discovery compared to other efforts related to the understanding, treatment and prevention of this virus is the one that is selected for the award, it is the one who gives the award, so what..........why?!
Ideological bias and the desire of Swedish institutions to have a role in advocating the theory of evolution is the reason we ask to answer all these questions.
This is a trend that has long been taken directly by many large scientific academies, such as NAS and AAAS in the United States, Royal Society in the United Kingdom, etc., and by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences in 2018 when it developed the pseudo-human evolution icon from monkeys, which all evolutionists know is not an accurate description of what they believe in the evolution of humans from monkeys, and when it entered the mention of evolution in a geometrical discovery, we find
All these efforts to support the theory of evolution and confirm its validity confirm that the opposition played an unprecedented role, and if the opposition is not scientific as they claim, why all the trouble?
Why is the Nobel Prize in Medicine going off track?
Why do they have to describe enzyme engineering as harnessing the power of evolution?
Why do they stuff their heads into an argument that's out of their league?
We hope, and we hope, that the evolutionists will come to us with a detailed refutation that proves what we have put forward wrong, if this happens we promise to delete the publication and apologize.
- Management of the Brahin Center
—
Source: Brahin Center website - Published 2022-10-04 (archived at the Internet Archive)
https://braheen.com/articles/evolution-design/معارضة-التطور-تجبر-لجنة-جائزة-نوبل-على-إعلان-تأييدها-لنظرية-التطور