There is a possibility that the parts are available in the right way, a possibility that they are available in the right way, a possibility that they are in the right place, and a possibility of avoiding unwanted interactions and parts.
And now with Dembski's paragraph.
(And her informal name: the paragraph of their thought and stress
)
There is a possibility that the parts will be available correctly, a possibility that they will be available simultaneously, a possibility that they will be in the right place, a possibility that the undesirable interactions and parts will be avoided correctly, a possibility that the parts will be aligned correctly, a possibility that the parts will be assembled in the right order, and a possibility that the parts will be formatted or prepared correctly!!!
Within the Darwinian framework, all of these possibilities are possible and not surprising at all, but for Desmbek, it was different!
Dempsey's position is a probabilities, and procrastination, as all math students know it, is a mathematical term to describe the relationship between variables, a procrastination to construct; it is necessarily a smaller number or equal to the product of all the above possibilities!
As advocates of evolution and design, we must all submit to the same mathematical rule to calculate the probability of complex systems emerging!
If all the previous possibilities of the emergence of recessive systems (such as molecular machines made up of proteins) are large, we can say that Darwinian evolution is correct and possible, although very small in all or one of them, then the design can be deduced!
Dembski further explains:
"Creation swings show that intelligent design theory is a testable scientific theory. Take, for example, the probability of parts compatibility. Scientists can combine existing biochemical systems – whether single proteins or complex biochemical machines – and see how well their parts match each other. They can combine these systems, mix them, and then retrieve them. If these systems bear the resulting confusion or confusion, then they can be candidates to engage in Darwinian evolution.
For example, in a simulation of how duplicating genes facilitate protein development, Michael Behe and David Snook developed a strategy to estimate the probabilities of conformation of parts of a bacterial flagellum system, estimating the size and generational size of a living population required to stabilize a new protein – compatible to operate within an irreducible complex system – in the group genome based on the process of replication of a protein-coding gene.
This is a long time and of course they will not wait to prove that the probability of installing a new protein is compatible with the parts of an irreducible complex system is very small.
Thus, according to the construction swing, this is an argument for the design on which the bacterial whip is based.”
Tomorrow, by God’s grace, we will be finished.
More:
https://braheen.com/publications/التصميم-الذكي-ومفهوم-التعقيد-المحدد
—
Source: Published on Facebook's "Braheen Center" page