Scientific theory is a field of science that describes a particular phenomenon for the purpose of explaining how it occurs, and to provide a set of predictions or predictions that can be refuted and tested to assess the validity of this theory.
Test and refutability of theories:
Scientific theory is a field of science that describes a particular phenomenon for the purpose of explaining how it occurs, and to provide a set of predictions or predictions that can be refuted and tested to assess the validity of this theory, and thus the acceptance of the scientific theory depends on the extent of its testability, and its ability to prove falsifiability.
It is called an "unfalsifiable theory" in the absence of experiments and tests that would prove the validity of this theory or not, so the criterion for the probability of falsity according to Popper and his peers is to show the difference between what is scientific and what is false, and to delineate the boundaries between them, and the testing of theories is the task of competent scientists in cooperation with philosophers of science.
The Science of Darwinism:
Philosophical references to the study of science suggest that most standard judgments are physics-based, where the causes of phenomena can be clearly identified without ambiguity by extrapolating laws such as thermodynamics, gravity, and the like.
But in biology, things don't go as simple as this except at the molecular cellular level, and the feasibility of prediction is only noticeable in functional biology and elementary levels based on the laws of biochemical reactions.
While scientists can test theories to the fullest with experiments in the practical sciences, it is different in sciences where experiments are impossible to perform and where speculation is of limited value in a particular hypothesis test, as in the historical sciences.
This has long been the case for biologists trying to answer the question about a unique historical event: how did millions of species originate?
To investigate this event, they will not be able to rely on cosmic laws, but they will have to study a set of additional observations that may help them in this regard, and then create an explanatory scenario that can be called a "historical tale."
But it is not possible to be sure of the occurrence of these historical tales, because they are unwitting, and the best to describe the chances of speculation that may offer is the possibility of probabilistic, because it is impossible to monitor and test the events that comprise them, and if you are not sure of the negotiations that led to the conclusion of the Anglo-Egyptian Treaty in 1936, the re-occurrence of this historical event is not available, and we can not in such a test.
Researchers recognize that modern Darwinism classifies a sentence as a kind of historical tale, because it is impossible to recreate its facts from the "beginning" and subject its events to censorship and direct observation, it covers a great and unheard-of period of history that occurred most of its chapters before the existence of man, and in its best case Darwinism can only provide a set of probabilistic – uncertain – predictions about how the species arose, because it will never be able to redevelop the events of a mammal.
Darwinism and the Winged Dragon - Ahmad Yahya - Issue 3
http://www.alukah.net/sharia/11753/76986/
—
Source: Published on Facebook's "Braheen Center" page