A castle of sand: the collapse of the evolution model of the whale from Mizonica

For more than three decades, evolutionists have constructed a sand castle to model the evolution of the whale from the mesonychians of the mid-sand group of mammals. Some of these morphological indicators, based on similarities in the shape of teeth and parts of the skull, have always been used to point to the origin of the mid-skull. In the late 1990s, some evidence came out of studies that used molecular techniques to explore relationships between groups of animals, which gave a completely different result to previous talk, and claimed that whales were closest to another class of mammals, including goats, pigs, cows, deer, camels, and hippos, called artiodactyls. This was done by studying comparisons of some noncoding regions of DNA that showed similarities between whale and hippocampuses (41). Molecular data directly conflicted with those of the fossil record, as it made comparisons between fossils and their attribution to the mesonychians, which were previously thought to be the ancestor of whales based on tooth shape and some features of the skull, play no role in evolution, and several scientific journals have written about the paradox's predicament. The expected reaction of paleontologists specializing in the study of the evolution of the whale at first was shock, and they questioned the seriousness of these molecular results and met them with rejection, so that Gingrich, one of the most prominent planners of his development scheme accused the owners of this view of being crazy! In the chaos of the discrepancy between the data, which cannot be combined into a single evolutionary scheme, one of the two ways of searching must be completely rejected, which is an embarrassment to the methodology of evolution, because it is assumed, according to Darwinism, that the fossil and molecular connotations are consistent in a single phylogeny. Here, many enthusiastic evolutionists of the previous kinship record – the hoofed medium – were forced to eat the Ajwa idol on which they had been engaged for three decades, and they accepted the molecular evidence of another kinship record, but what are the similarities in the shape of the teeth and fossil skull on which the castle of whale evolution was built? Of course, the solution to this problem is canned and ready for direct consumption, and I think you know it well; it is the convergent evolution, and the most obvious records of evolution have simply been retracted, and the similarity between these forms has been traced back to the so-called convergent evolution unrelated to a predecessor, i.e., this similarity in teeth and ear bones adopted to draw kinship, no longer indicates a common ancestor as the scientific journals have shown. - Ahmed Yahya, The Impossible Saga: The Problems of Inferring the Record of Excavations on Evolution, p 72 — Source: Published on Facebook's "Braheen Center" page https://www.facebook.com/braheen.org/posts/pfbid02L1KLFTaDj9CyFDyDwWSG2MSxsvr6rhDbfajTzU3AQtRCyhPqcy5tLxsyq11VaZdgl