The Origination Inequality

The Origination Inequality The seven obstacles mentioned above should not be considered as purely subjective or qualitative challenges facing Darwinian mechanisms. It is possible to estimate the challenge that these obstacles pose to them quantitatively or qualitatively. Each obstacle has the possibility of accompanying as shown in the picture. Note that each of these possibilities is conditional on its previous probability. That is, the probability of synchronization includes the probability of synchronization is justified by the availability of the required parts. Similarly, the probability of grouping order includes the probability that the grouping occurs in the correct order provided that all the parts are in the right place at the right time with no cross-over interactions and full compatibility between the parts. Thus the probability of the emergence of the complex irreducible system by Darwinian methods is equal or less than the probability of all probability multiplication. P_avail×P_sync×P_local×P_(i-c-r)×P_(i-f-c)×P_(o-o-a)×P_config If we know P_origin (probability of construction) the possibility of creating an irreducible complex system in Darwinian ways will result in the following swing known as construction swing: P_origin≤P_avail×P_sync×P_local×P_(i-c-r)×P_(i-f-c)×P_(o-o-a)×P_config Given that the probability is between 0 and 1, this arbitrage tells us that the probability of a small probability of one of the possibilities in the right of the arbitrage is small, meaning that the probability of creation is also small – that is, it cannot be greater than any of the possibilities mentioned. We conclude that we do not need to calculate all of the possibilities in the right of the arbitrage to make sure that the probability of creation is small, and that we do not need to calculate these possibilities accurately, and therefore only know the reliable upper limits of these possibilities. We conclude that if the probability of creation is small the system will be of a specific complexity, and as long as the specific complexity is a reliable experimental sign of the design this system is designed. Procrastination shows that intelligent design theory is a testable scientific theory. Take, for example, the possibility of parts compatibility. Scientists can collect existing biochemical systems – whether single proteins or complex biochemical machines – and know how well their parts are compatible with each other. They can collect these systems, mix them, and then retrieve them again. If these systems bear the resulting process of mixing or confusion, they can be candidates to engage in Darwinian evolution, but these systems can not be so sensitive to evolution. For example, in a simulation of how duplicating a protein's evolution process, Michael Behe and David Snook developed a strategy for estimating the probability of conformation of parts in a microbial flagellum system. Estimating the size of a living population and the number of generations required for a new, conformable protein to function in an irreducibly complex system in the genome of a population based on a protein gene replication process, the initial results were no less than about 10/20 for the population and about 10/8 for this. However, there is no radical obstacle to a proven and reliable empirical estimate of the compatibility of the parts and other possibilities found in the construction swing, and today both Darwinists and design scientists are trying to participate in the estimation of these possibilities, and research on this subject is still in its infancy. The construction swing does not deny, nor confirm, the intelligent design of irreducible biochemical systems. If all the possibilities are large or unknown, it can be said that the system does not show specific complexity and then Darwinists have the right to reject the idea that this system is designed intelligently, but if one of these possibilities is small enough then the system is of specific complexity. In this case, as long as the specific complexity is a reliable experimental sign of intelligence, design scientists have the right to insist that these systems show signs of intelligent design, and so we see that the construction swing plays some role in the preference between Darwinian evolution and intelligent design theory. More: https://braheen.com/publications/التصميم-الذكي-ومفهوم-التعقيد-المحدد — Source: Published on Facebook's "Braheen Center" page