Evolutionary scientists routinely tell us that the fossil evidence for Darwin’s theory of human evolution from a monkey-like creature is indisputable.
Evolutionists routinely tell us that the fossil evidence for Darwin's theory of human evolution from an ape-like creature is indisputable. For example, anthropologist Ronald Witherington testified before the Texas Board of Education in 2009 that "it is possible to say that human evolution is confirmed by a more complete series of fossils than all mammals in the world.
A deluge into the details of scientific publications on the subject reveals a very different story from what Weathernton and other evolutionists describe in public debates, and this chapter will show that fossil evidence of human evolution is fragmentary, difficult to decipher, and hotly contested.
Indeed, the fossil record (and far from repeating the phrase "a typical example of gradual evolutionary changes") reveals a fundamental disconnect between ape-like and hominin fossils, with hominin fossils appearing in the fossil record suddenly and without clear evolutionary ancestors, making the hypothesis of human evolution based on fossils questionable.
More: https://braheen.com/publications/العلم-وأصل-الإنسان
—
Source: Published on Facebook's "Braheen Center" page
https://www.facebook.com/braheen.org/posts/pfbid0ntBbJoCWYcv9LLv4DYRRtr2w5H7agcLHXjZ5YRTE4Do6UYUt8bnDUZ75HpFU8sAvl