Humans agree on universal moral values

One of the most remarkable things in human beings is their agreement with public moral values such as good justice, honesty, and the ugliness of injustice, lying, and cheating. This is on the absolute general level, but when you download these absolute values on reality, people may differ in application; but you do not find one who claims that lying is better than truth or that injustice is better than justice. We know that justice is good and injustice is ugly and that truth is good and falsehood is ugly. When a man is offered to believe the truth and believe and offer him to believe falsehood and lie money in his own nature to the first and the second, he knows that in the nature of man what drives him to believe the truth and the will of good and aversion to falsehood. The existence of this moral instinct is evidence of the existence of the Creator, the moral instinct is the subjective criterion by which we judge, and the philosophers of ethics call it the moral sense or conscience, and these philosophers differ in the fact that this sense is replaced by emotion or reason; but what concerns us here is that the existence of this instinct requires the existence of its creator and that its existence is an indication of the existence of the Creator. This is what is known as the “Ontological Moral Argument” for the existence of God, which starts from the proof of the existence of objective moral values in nature to its indication of the existence of its creator and innate in man, and it is different from the practical moral evidence that starts from the practical necessity of morality, which was developed by the German philosopher (Emanuel Kant) and will be discussed in detail later. - Dr. Hisham Azmi More: https://braheen.com/publications/الإلحاد-للمبتدئين — Source: Published on Facebook's "Braheen Center" page https://www.facebook.com/braheen.org/posts/pfbid0VC3Z3J51kKu5hwPwKzV1C6tmLKgjWZQshSRqCNZu6Dcs7XwKgH6bYDYndeTYTMMil