When we say that “judgments based on scientific evidence, whether in the laboratory or in the courtroom, are met with a definite rejection that does not even accept it as research; just because it contradicts the concept of some of the prevailing scientific consensus.” He believes that those who say this...
Some People Have a Utopian View of Science!
When we say that "judgments based on scientific evidence, whether in the laboratory or the courtroom, are categorically rejected, they are not even accepted as research, simply because they contradict the concept of some of the prevailing scientific consensus."
He thinks that those who say these words are a group outside the scientific practice!!
When we say that “almost every generally accepted opinion has ever been considered gay or heretical”...
The convergent thinks he's in front of an outside attempt to challenge the merit of the entire scientific practice!
When we say, “The progress of science is increased by the replacement of old opinions, and by the gradual replacement of cumulative scientific knowledge. The automatic rejection of contrary opinions that challenge traditional convictions is a dangerous fallacy.”
They think we're talking!
Imagine who would have asked themselves to write these quotations opposing the scientific consensus?
Are they a bunch of ignorant idiots who have nothing to do with scientific practice?
Let them know themselves better.
"As scientists, physicists, historians of science, and sociologists, members of the scientific community, we affirm as friends of the Court that this is not the way scientists work in their pursuit of truth. We challenge the Ninth Circuit Court's assumption that a good scientific proposition is only what is generally accepted and published in international peer-reviewed journals, and reject the notion that scientific analysis and conclusions, which may differ from what the Court considers a published consensus, are not reliable in advance. Even if a determination in the existence and nature of unanimity was possible a task fraught with difficulties in itself the prevailing views and traditional convictions have always been buried in the dust of the history of science.”
The passages are adapted from the amicus brief presented to the court by a group of scientists (including the famous evolutionary Stephen Gould) in the 1993 Dupert case.
Sign the memo:
Ronal Baer, Professor in the Department of Medical Social Sciences at Columbia University School of Public Health.
RONALD BAYER is a Professor at Columbia University, Division of Sociomedical Sciences, School of Public Health.
Stephen Jay Gould, Aleksandr Agassiz Professor of Zoology, Professor of Geology, and Professor of the History of Science at Harvard University.
STEPHEN JAY GOULD is Alexander Agassiz Professor of Zoology, Professor of Geology, and Professor of the History of Science at Harvard University.
- Gerald Holton, Malnkrot Professor of Physics and Professor of History of Science at Harvard University.
GERALD HOLTON is Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics and Professor of the History of Science at Harvard University.
- Peter F. Infante, Ph.D. in Epidemiology and Doctor of Dental Surgery.
PETER F. INFANTE holds a doctorate in epidemiology and a Doctor of Dental Surgery.
Philip Landrigan, Ethel H. Weiss Professor of Community Medicine at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, Chair of Community Medicine and Director of Environmental and Occupational Medicine.
PHILIP LANDRIGAN is the Ethel H. Wise Professor of Community Medicine at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, where he is Chair of the Department of Community Medicine and Director of the Division of Environmental and Occupational Medicine.
Everett Mendelson is Professor of History of Science at Harvard University.
EVERETT MENDELSOHN is Professor of the History of Science at Harvard University.
Robert Morris, M.D. in Environmental Engineering and M.Sc. in Statistical Biology, is an adjunct professor in the Department of Epidemiology and Statistical Biology at the Milwaukee School of Medicine in Wisconsin.
ROBERT MORRIS is a physician who also holds a Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering and an M.S. in Biostatistics. He is an Assistant Professor in the Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Herbert Niedelman is Professor of Pediatrics and Child Psychology at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
HERBERT NEEDLEMAN is Professor of Child Psychiatry and Pediatrics at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
Dorothy Nielkin is a professor at New York University, where she teaches at the Department of Sociology and Law School.
DOROTHY NELKIN is a University Professor at New York University, where she teaches in the Department of Sociology and the School of Law.
William Nicholson, Professor of Medicine at Mount Sinai School of Medicine, City University of New York.
WILLIAM NICHOLSON is a Professor at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York.
- Kathleen Joy-Probert, Ph.D. in Statistical Biology, Assistant Professor of Statistical Biology at the Harvard School of Public Health.
KATHLEEN JOY PROPERT has degrees in biology and a doctorate in biostatistics. She is Assistant Professor of Biostatistics at the Harvard School of Public Health.
- David Rosner, Professor of History at Baruch College and Member of the Teaching Board at the Alumni Center of the City University of New York, and Assistant Professor in the Department of Community Medicine at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine.
DAVID ROSNER is a Professor of History at Baruch College and CUNY Graduate Center Doctoral Faculty, and an Adjunct Professor in the Department of Community Medicine at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine.
- Ayesha.
—
Source: Published on Facebook's "Braheen Center" page
https://www.facebook.com/braheen.org/posts/pfbid02zCRcEwDt1SaAmU2e7fcaVjz5FtQSkwcH3BcRXy7yAstdrffYWm1PAPfZ4EtRzAjnl
Comments
There are no published comments yet. Be the first to comment.
