And I don't know why that point is missing from so many who are interested in studying it... It means now if you want to say that science has proven that honesty is good in itself, what are the consequences?
Empirical Science Has Authority!
I don’t know why so many people are interested in studying.
Now if you want to say that science has proven that honesty is good in itself, what are the consequences?
The implication is that you implicitly accept the possibility of refuting this concept with science!
That is, it is possible to come up with an experiment that tests the variables you relied on to reach your result, and come up with a counter-result!
Thus, a self-evident and self-defeating concept becomes a controversial one!
Expanding the circle of experimental science to spaces that do not have enough tools to test it is what many researchers and philosophers today call "scienctism," as a kind of expression of the over-indulgence of the possibilities and tools of experimental science.
At the same time, it is supported by many researchers, especially within the framework of cognitive neuroscience, which in our view is as bad for science as it is for mental concepts.
- Ayesha.
—
Source: Published on Facebook's "Braheen Center" page
https://www.facebook.com/braheen.org/posts/pfbid02a7jkRVCNmcYxMBkfZSTdnuZAE7rU6rBhLfpJivNng5Pi3VzmLoPUaRWNZUBR5ZyTl