Even you, NCBI!

Even you NCBI!! The NCBI for those who don’t know is the National Center for Biotechnology Information, the world’s most renowned medical and biological research engine. But...! Like other scientific institutions, they always try to spread popular ideas about evolution, even though they know the extent of the disagreement. We are not talking about knowing that there is a total opposition to the theory of evolution, they reject it in principle! But we are talking about that even among those who accept the validity of the theory of evolution, there is a controversy between those who see that the current birds are an extinct dinosaur breed, and those who see that the current birds are the product of the gradual development of a completely different group of extinct reptiles! On National Dinosaur Day, the NCBI celebrates the evolution of dinosaurs that eventually brought us the country duck! Dr. Jonathan Wells summarizes the controversy in the following lines: "According to the 'dinosaur bird' hypothesis group, flying evolved from above; feathers grew in small dinosaurs, which later ran, then jumped, then slid, and eventually flew. According to the other group, the idea that dinosaurs with feet (with large hind limbs and small front limbs) evolved into birds is contrary to common sense, and it is more likely that flying evolved from under trees; ancient reptiles first jumped from trees, then slithered, and then slitted."1 The question of the identity of the common ancestor of current birds has sparked controversy among evolutionary biologists in the past 50 years, and that’s what the NCBI knows best, and that’s where the criticism is coming from now! Why do scientific institutions insist on responding to populist rumors about evolution, such as the evolution of birds from dinosaurs or the evolution of humans from monkeys, despite knowing full well the inaccuracy of these things among those who believe in the validity of evolutionary assumptions and their lack of conformity to the scientific debate that has not ended? Why did the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences’ chemistry donor insist on inserting the pseudo-icon that charts monkey evolution into humans in 2018, when Darwinian evolutionary hypotheses had no merit in Dr. Arnold’s findings? Why the Nobel Committee at the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden introduced the evolution of humans from monkeys in 2022, in a discovery related to the evolution of humans from humans! All of these questions are answered in the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS, or the world’s largest scientific body) published in 2006, when it decided to issue a statement to silence the debate over the theory of evolution at this time due to the Dover Tribunal, by saying that “there is no significant debate within the scientific community about the validity of the theory of evolution”! Although the only justification for issuing this statement was that the debate had already been raging, and for many years between scientists supporting the theory of evolution, and between specialized scientists, academics and graduates from the same universities and studying in the same universities to which they belong, contrary to the basic framework of the theory of evolution! The idea that there is no notable argument about the validity of the theory of evolution, which the AAAS has written so clearly, is implicit in this NCBI act, or the Nobel in 2018 or the Nobel in 2022, and we may find it in 2025, 2030, and 2050! Only God knows how long some major scientific institutions will still deny the existence of a debate on individual issues of evolution, or on evolution itself. Will we live to see the fall of the evolutionary narrative, as we live in those days signs of the fall of the narrative ..? God knows! But my humble and unreliable view in any international or domestic forum (and thank you for the preamble you don’t want to get out of my head) is that it still takes decades of research from us, the opponents of evolutionary dogma, to promote that research. Do not forget to pray to our brothers and sisters that God will soon release their anguish, and that our eyes will soon acknowledge their help. - Ayesha. — Source: Published on Facebook's "Braheen Center" page https://www.facebook.com/braheen.org/posts/pfbid02ALCEXgTz5vpptaWVaA4xx69YetrWqTk6MCTcjymbdGH4dbrNtW9cgRkv26HTS77Bl