The young man enters groups on Facebook or sites that raise atheistic suspicions in a sound intention and the same yearning to defend the religion of God, but rarely comes out and was not affected by this amount of suspicion that squeezes the heart and disturbs the conscience.
The young man enters groups on Facebook or sites that raise atheistic suspicions in a sound intention and the same yearning to defend the religion of God, but rarely comes out and was not affected by this amount of suspicion that squeezes the heart and disturbs the conscience, and this must be the basic warning and warning of the issuance of this file without legal rooting and solid knowledge, helps build immunity from this sedition, which shows the return of a prophet and black becomes a son. Because this harm is much greater than its benefit, it often does not come out of two results: the first is to go out and hold the person in his heart what disturbs his serenity, or to present the arguments of religion in a meager manner that increases the atheist error or conveys a doubter of total atheism; because of the weakness of his scientific goods and methodological tools.
For the seriousness of this matter, I put the tool of the Mahmaq to be the capital of the youth of these suspicions that come to the person without a summons, and in the example of the article is clear:
Suppose someone brought a picture from the web pages of a child with some kind of disability and then followed it with “Where is God’s wisdom and mercy in that?”
The solution lies in re-discussion of the origin we say: Look at those around you from birth and humans, do you see in their creation mostly «guided » health or disability? Wisdom or tampering? ... Then we say the correct scientific approach that if you know something in a certain scientific context to return it to science, if you return this state of disability to its origin, you will know that there is some wisdom and there is mercy, they are present and if absent you, you do not have to know it.
Ammar Suleiman, The Instrument of Arbitrators and its Impact on the Security and Safety of the Individual and Society of Atheist Thought, Research of the Conference on Intellectual Directions between Freedom of Expression and Sharia Courts, Muslim World League.
Full article here: https://themwl.org/sites/default/files/fc38s4r6.pdf
—
Source: Published on Facebook's "Braheen Center" page
https://www.facebook.com/braheen.org/posts/pfbid0K2XcfJ1aQfdHf9pzX4rmA8XFvmBi3EVwNLC9Ww7cGbUo3SZXxF8b4K2iExE73f5zl
Comments
There are no published comments yet. Be the first to comment.
