Texts are translated automatically from Arabic. Original files and media retain their original language.

Atheism

The Higgs boson and god of atheists.

6 min read

A scientific report on the theory of Peter Higgs and its relationship to the hypothesis of God may mark the signs of wonder and astonishment on the faces of our readers of the title, which may seem strange in its two parts, but we will not let those signs last much, where the desired will become clear after lines...

The Higgs boson and god of atheists. A Scientific Report on Peter Higgs' Theory and Its Relation to the God Hypothesis Perhaps the signs of wonder and astonishment on the faces of our readers from the title, which may seem strange in its naughty, but we will not let those signs last much, where it will become clear what is meant after lines. Let's start with his first apartment and the Higgs boson, a heavy elementary-virtual particle, about 200 times the mass of a proton, thought to be responsible for the material gaining mass. Practical signals of it were detected in 2011 at the Large Hadron Collider, where the Siren Laboratory announced on July 4, 2012 that its existence was actually 99.999% confirmed. In 1964, British theoretical physicist Peter Higgs predicted its existence within the framework of the Standard Physical Model, which assumes that the fundamental forces – the four forces of the universe – separated at the Big Bang, and the force of gravity was the first to separate, followed by the rest of the forces. According to this theory, bosons are thought to be responsible for the mass of elementary particles, such as electrons, protons, neutrons, etc., by the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in the Siren laboratory, where protons reach almost the speed of light. Perhaps surprisingly, at the collider two proton beams are aimed at the speed of light against each other vertically, and the results of this collision, which is similar to the conditions of the Big Bang, are then studied on a miniature scale. To represent the conditions of the 10-35th time moment of the first second after the Big Bang, at which the Higgs bosons are thought to have formed, their synthesis requires conditions of up to 5,000 billion electron volts.[1] According to the Standard Model, the Higgs particle is not charged, since its spin is equal to zero and is therefore considered to be a boson. According to calculations by the Fermilab Laboratory of the United States in 2006, it is assumed to have a mass between 117 and 153 GVA/c2 (based on the mass of the boson-W). In early 2011, scientists obtained the first results of experiments at the Large Hadron Collider of the European Agency for Nuclear Research (CERN). They published them in scientific journals, and they indicate the presence of a Higgs particle in several blocks with a high degree of certainty. According to these measurements, the mass of the Higgs particle is between 116-130 GVA/c2 (Atlas experiment) or therefore between 115-127 GVA/c2 (Moun composite spiral experiment). - Imagine Higgs: Higgs' perception of the matter consists in a field called the Higgs field arising from the presence of Higgs particles, and that this field is so thick that the particles find resistance under his influence, and this effect on the emergence of what we call the mass of the particle. The electron in the Higgs field encounters a small resistance and has a small mass, while another particle such as the proton finds resistance - according to the theory of Higgs - large (can be compared to the viscosity of liquids) in this field). In the Large Hadron Collider, protons orbiting the LHC ring collide at a speed comparable to that of light in opposite directions, with an accelerated proton energy of about 5.3 trillion electron volts. The protons are also in reverse and have the same velocity as the protons of the first flux and invite them to collide with energy that is then twice their energy (i.e., 7 trillion electron volts in the middle of a large counter). That energy mimics the energy that existed during the Big Bang but in a small context. Einstein's energy from the follow-up of particles that appeared immediately after the Big Bang. The study of these resulting particles helps us to understand the origin of matter and the universe. The large meter records all the particles and radiation that arise (see Atlas experiment). On the other hand, the standard model of particles does not contain a clear explanation for the existence of gravity, a fundamental force in the universe. The model also says nothing about dark energy and dark matter, which make up about 80% of the universe, and physicists hope to find through the Large Hadron Collider discoveries that explain these mysteries. How do atheists look at it?! An atheist always claims that his method of understanding things is scientific and that the evidence he always asks for is scientific and does not accept even rational evidence (although scientific is a branch of the mind) and that his framework, which is always the framework of matter and does not accept at all any of the metaphysical contexts. But this claim soon disappears in the face of the continued practices of attaching any modern scientific discovery, the hypothesis of God. Whenever they see a recent scientific discovery in any field, they rush to the people! - It was impossible to obsess, whenever a new fossil appeared, they said that we no longer need a god, whenever experimental material science reached a discovery, they said that the arguments of the believers ended with the existence of a god, and that this does not indicate rationality or pure thought or anything like that, but it is an internal psychological need that always seeks to reassure her that there is no God. The truth that should never be overlooked is that an atheist can never escape belief in a god, but does not accept that this god, is the wise, creative god, but finds no qualms about being his own (accidental), (random) or (mother nature). - After the news of confirming the existence of the particle, opinions were spread by calling it a "God particle" to indicate that it is the place of God in the universe. We do not know where the proof in this discovery is that God does not exist? This particle itself needs to be explained and many questions. Who made the laws of this particle? Who gave it this ability to form a mass? And where was this mass that exploded before the Big Bang? And where was it found? How can it be certain that nature created it? Who is this powerful nature capable of finding this mass? What was there before this mass existed? The failure to answer these questions, and their inability to find a way out of them, shows that they have not even been able to assert for themselves that the Creator does not exist. Is it right or wrong?! Do you believe in God or do you believe in God? How does the insurer see it? Every new revelation in the universe is a new proof of the greatness of God, who is the best of all creation. God tells us that there is nothing in the size of the atom or even greater in the sky or on the earth, but with Him is knowledge and knowledge. This is the material science until the beginning of the twentieth century, does not know smaller than the atom, the atom is for him the smallest thing, and from them the particles and then the objects, they are for him the unity of the composition of matter, but the Koran had another opinion and not in this day or that century. - I do not know frankly did not insist Malaheed today to introduce - particle - in the equation of the existence of God and not. As they did before - and they do - to infer the eternity of the article law of the survival of energy, and then come theory of the Big Bang to demolish all this and put them in a dilemma did not come out of it, and still some of us adhere to his belief in the eternity of matter. Some atheists rejoiced in this revelation because they hung their eyes on his name the particle God or the particle God, and we have shown the reason for his name that name, and they thought the particle that acts as God in explaining the existence of the universe ... and they were disappointed and this is shown in the statement of one of them .. where the atheist says: Daniel Sarriowitz (after the discovery of the Higgs particle) Sometimes science should give way to religion. References: The Higgs-Wikipedia Arabian boson. Daniel Sarewitz, Sometimes Science Should Make Room for Religion, Nature Arabic Edition. 3- Ibrahim al-Ramah ( IAlrammah), The God's Particle: A Sign for the Believers and a Sedition for the Atheists, twitmail.com/email/3779858/1/3. - Mustafa Nasr Qadeeh — Source: Brahin Center website - Published on 2020-02-24 (archived at the Internet Archive) http://braheen.com:80/mag/1st/23-higgs-boson

Comments

There are no published comments yet. Be the first to comment.

Add your comment

Comments are reviewed before publication.

Visitor Statistics

Loading statistics…

Today’s visitors

—

Online now

—

Today follows Morocco’s time zone. Online now means visitors active within the last two minutes. Counts are approximate; each browser is counted once per day.

Where are our readers visiting from?

Loading visitors by country…

Countries are estimated. We do not display visitors’ IP addresses or precise locations.