Is the brain who thinks and thinks? The fallacy of cognitive neuroscience

Cognitive neuroscience assumes that the brain has certain cognitive, cognitive, and moral abilities. We have the brain that thinks, thinks, interprets, and experiences things and transmits them. This is apparent in the slightest reflection on the work of Antonio da Maceo and Sam Harris, for example. "Our brains can often decide well in seconds or minutes, depending on the time frame we set for achieving the goal we want. Even free will is incompatible with subjective truths about us, and introspection is evident as opposed to this idea as well as the laws of physics. Acts of will only emerge spontaneously (being causative, non-causative, or potentially deviant does not affect), and their origin cannot be traced in our conscious minds. One or two minutes of self-observation and you will notice that you have no more to decide on the next idea than the next one I will write.[2] But our ordinary language, which is the supreme justification, does not allow for this use, as Wittgenstein described: "It is only man and what he behaves like that can be said to have sensations, to see, to be blind, to hear, to be deaf, to be conscious or to be unconscious." [PI 281] Norman Malcolm, Wittgenstein’s pupil, says, “Can the brain have thoughts, illusions, or pains?The meaning of this assumption seems so obvious that I find it difficult to take it seriously.No experiment has been able to prove this result for the brain, why not? To say that something like the brain feels or thinks is another use that can be called secondary or metaphorical, but to replace the human body with something to talk about it is a clear misstatement, the brain is not going through different experiences. - Reza Zeidan. — Source: Published on Facebook's "Braheen Center" page